PAPER CUPS HAVE PLASTIC LININGS

PAPER CUPS HAVE PLASTIC LININGS In the classic fairy tale “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” it was an innocent little boy who saw the truth — that the emperor was wearing nothing at all. Today, I find myself longing for a modern-day version of that boy, someone who will point out an equally inconvenient truth: that our so-called “paper” cups are not purely paper. Most of them contain a thin lining of at least 5% plastic or wax. While it might not sound like a big deal, that small plastic lining makes a significant difference. The layer, usually made of polyethylene, serves to keep liquids from soaking through the paper. In some cases, manufacturers use wax instead, which is somewhat more environmentally friendly. But here’s the catch: without proper labeling, how can the average consumer distinguish between a wax-lined cup and a plastic-lined one? Fast food chains and restaurant owners might argue that a 5% plastic content is negligible. After all, isn’t it better than using 100% plastic cups? It’s a fair argument, but it’s eerily reminiscent of the same logic used to justify single-use plastic sachets. They’re small, convenient, and seemingly harmless — until you multiply them by the billions. Then there’s the issue of the lids. The plastic cover or cap that usually comes with a paper cup is almost always made of plastic. Some companies try to ease our guilt by claiming that these are “compostable.” But let’s be honest: those claims often come with asterisks. Industrial composters are required to break down these so-called compostable plastics, and such facilities are far from common in the Philippines. Even if these lids could be processed, who ensures they are collected, segregated, and transported to an industrial composting plant? The truth is that most of these lids end up in landfills or, worse, our oceans. It’s a half-truth at best to claim they’re eco-friendly without considering the infrastructure necessary to follow through. And what about the cups themselves? Should we recycle them as paper or as plastic? The plastic lining renders most of them unsuitable for conventional paper recycling facilities. In the end, they contribute to the ever-growing problem of microplastics — the same environmental concern we associate with single-use plastics. Faced with this dilemma, it may sound absurd, but perhaps the solution is to shift entirely to 100% plastic cups. At least then there would be no ambiguity about how to recycle them. And with innovations in biodegradable plastics and cassava-based materials, these alternatives could be genuinely sustainable. But the real answer lies not in relying on consumers to navigate a sea of misleading labels. The government must take the lead. A joint Technical Working Group (TWG) led by the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), with participation from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Department of Agriculture (DA), Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), and research institutions like the University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB), could spearhead the development of clear policies on sustainable packaging. Private sector participation would also be crucial. Packaging companies and fast-food chains must be part of the conversation, contributing ideas and committing to sustainable transitions. With the right policies in place, businesses can be incentivized to use biodegradable materials or invest in recycling infrastructure. At the end of the day, we don’t need magical solutions — just sensible ones. But it will take a collective voice to point out the naked truth about paper cups and demand meaningful change. If that innocent little boy from the fairy tale were here today, he’d surely have something to say. Let’s listen. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-14-2025

ALLOWING THE PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL TREE SURGEONS

ALLOWING THE PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL TREE SURGEONS Have you ever heard of tree surgeons? While it’s a widely recognized profession in many countries, it remains relatively unknown here in the Philippines. And no, they are not medical doctors who operate on humans, but they do perform surgeries of a different kind — on trees. Just like how surgeons care for their patients, tree surgeons provide essential care to ensure the health, safety, and longevity of our trees. So why bring this up now? I am prompted by the ongoing discussions about billions worth of tree planting programs in the country. While these programs are commendable, it is concerning that no one seems to be talking about the crucial role of tree surgeons in ensuring the success of these efforts. Understanding the Role of Tree Surgeons The difference between a gardener and a tree surgeon is akin to the difference between an electrician and an electrical engineer, or perhaps a cook and a chef. While both may have practical experience, the latter has undergone specialized training and certification. Similarly, tree surgeons possess expert knowledge in tree biology, diseases, and maintenance techniques. They can assess tree health, conduct necessary pruning, diagnose illnesses, and safely remove hazardous trees. Unfortunately, the Philippines lacks formal education programs specific to arboriculture. The closest related discipline is the forestry course offered at the University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB). However, forestry focuses primarily on forest management rather than urban tree care. This absence of certified arborists leaves a significant gap in the proper maintenance of our trees, particularly in urban areas where trees require specialized care. Building a Path for Arboriculture in the Philippines One practical solution is to introduce technical training programs for arborists through the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA). Existing courses such as Horticulture NC III and Landscape Installation and Maintenance NC II could serve as foundational training for those aspiring to become tree surgeons. These programs could provide basic knowledge in tree care, disease management, and safe pruning techniques. Another suggestion is for the government to set benchmarks for tree care management. For every 1,000 trees planted under a government tree-planting or reforestation project, there should be a required number of certified arborists to ensure proper maintenance. Professionalizing this role could help prevent the wastage of resources and ensure long-term environmental benefits. Beyond Planting: A Commitment to Tree Care Planting trees is just the beginning. Real success lies in nurturing these trees until maturity. Without proper care, many of these trees risk dying prematurely, succumbing to disease, or causing property damage due to structural weaknesses. Tree surgeons could be the guardians that ensure these trees grow strong and healthy. Furthermore, integrating arboriculture into the professional qualifications of forest rangers can amplify our reforestation and conservation efforts. Forest rangers trained in arboriculture can diagnose and treat tree diseases in protected areas, contributing to healthier forests and more resilient ecosystems. An Opportunity for Livelihood and Environmental Impact Promoting the practice of tree surgeons could also create new livelihood opportunities. Certified tree surgeons could offer their services to private landowners, local government units, and agricultural plantations. Additionally, the government could subsidize tree care services for fruit farms, tree plantations, and even mangrove forests to boost agricultural productivity and coastal protection. Looking Ahead It’s time we recognize the vital role that tree surgeons play in maintaining our green spaces. The government should take decisive steps to institutionalize arboriculture training programs and encourage the practice of tree surgery as a legitimate profession. What are your thoughts on this? Could professional tree surgeons be the missing piece in our reforestation and urban greening efforts? If you have ideas on how we can grow this profession in the Philippines, let’s keep the conversation going. After all, trees are not just about planting — they’re about nurturing, caring, and ensuring they thrive for generations to come. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-13-2025

REVIVING THE GOOD SIDE OF THE HEMP INDUSTRY

REVIVING THE GOOD SIDE OF THE HEMP INDUSTRY It seems there are two sides to the hemp industry: the good side and the bad side. Unfortunately, because of the bad side, the good side has also been effectively shut down. The ban extends beyond the harmful use of cannabis to all forms of hemp-related products, even though many of them are perfectly legal and beneficial. The good side of hemp includes a wide range of applications. Hemp is a versatile plant used to produce textiles, clothing, paper, construction materials, food, drinks, health and beauty products, fuels, ropes, and nets. It’s an incredibly sustainable crop, offering environmental benefits like soil improvement and carbon sequestration. Despite its potential, hemp cultivation remains prohibited in the Philippines due to its association with marijuana. While marijuana is a banned substance in many countries, it has been legalized for recreational use in some places and for medical purposes in others. Both hemp and marijuana come from the Cannabis sativa plant, but the difference lies in the THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) content. Hemp contains very low levels of THC, the compound responsible for the psychoactive effects of marijuana. However, the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972 (Republic Act No. 6425) does not differentiate between the two, classifying all forms of cannabis as illegal. Is this a classic case of “throwing the baby out with the bathwater”? By banning the entire cannabis plant, we are also eliminating industries that could provide significant economic opportunities. A large portion of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and cottage industries could benefit from hemp cultivation and processing, creating jobs and fostering rural development. The real problem is the difficulty of regulating the plant. Without stringent controls, the risk of harvested hemp being diverted for illegal purposes remains. But surely, there are ways to address this. A Call for Controlled Hemp Zones One suggestion is to establish specialized economic zones where hemp cultivation is strictly monitored. In these zones, hemp could be grown and processed in regulated environments, ensuring every harvest is accounted for. This strategy would minimize the risk of illegal diversion while supporting legitimate businesses. Forming a Technical Working Group The Department of Agriculture (DA) should lead the way in creating a Technical Working Group (TWG) to study the feasibility of reviving the hemp industry. This TWG could include the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), and academic institutions like the University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB). Through collaborative research and pilot projects, the TWG could assess how to balance the economic benefits of hemp production with effective regulatory measures. Lessons could be learned from countries like the United States and Canada, where hemp is legally grown under clear guidelines. Alternative Uses and Environmental Benefits In addition to economic potential, hemp presents numerous environmental benefits. Hemp is known for its ability to restore degraded soil and requires minimal pesticide use. It also absorbs significant amounts of carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change mitigation. Furthermore, researchers are exploring the potential of hemp as a sustainable alternative for construction materials like hempcrete, which is durable, energy-efficient, and carbon-negative. Moving Forward Revisiting the hemp ban does not mean endorsing marijuana use. It simply means recognizing the plant’s diverse applications and regulating its cultivation for industrial purposes. There is no doubt that strict regulations and law enforcement are necessary. However, with careful planning, the good side of the hemp industry can be revived without compromising public safety. If you have thoughts on how we can achieve this balance, I’d love to hear from you. After all, finding solutions together is how we can ensure sustainable progress for our industries and communities. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-12-2025

PROTECTING AGAINST HORNET INFESTATION

PROTECTING AGAINST HORNET INFESTATION I believe in solving problems at the bud, before they would even grow into bigger problems. Such is the case of the Asian hornet, which is beginning to manifest itself as a problem in the Philippines now, although it is not yet as widespread as to cause an alarm. Although largely unnoticed, hornets are a threat to our honey industry because they are predators of honeybees. The honey industry in the Philippines is growing steadily. In 2025, market revenue is projected to reach approximately $498.64 million, with an annual growth rate of 6.34% expected from 2025 to 2030. Local, organic honey is gaining popularity as consumers become more health conscious. Simply put, a large-scale hornet infestation could mean the end of the honey industry, shutting down many cottage businesses. We should declare a war against hornets as early as now. Who should lead us in this war? Obviously, it should be the Department of Agriculture (DA). But this is not a war that should be left to the DA alone. It would be best to form a Technical Working Group (TWG) with the DA as the lead agency. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), and the University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB), along with other state universities and colleges (SUCs) offering agriculture courses, should also be members. While chemicals may offer quick relief, we must exercise caution. The indiscriminate use of chemicals against hornets could harm beneficial insects, wildlife, and even farm animals. Exploring non-chemical methods, such as pheromone traps and biological control, could provide more sustainable solutions. Could there be good uses for these hornets? Some studies suggest that insects could become a sustainable source of protein or nutrients for animal feeds. Perhaps this is worth investigating further. Additionally, pest control companies like Rentokil and MAPECON could partner with the government in developing environmentally responsible eradication strategies. These companies have the expertise to contribute to the containment of hornet infestations. Hornets are also known to damage fruit crops, including apples, pears, and grapes. The government should conduct studies to identify other vulnerable fruits and develop protection plans. Furthermore, it is crucial to protect our mangrove trees from hornets. Mangroves play a vital role in our coastal ecosystems, acting as nurseries for marine life and protecting against coastal erosion. In the Philippines, honey production is sustained by a network of small-scale farms, cottage industries, and indigenous communities. For example, Palawan Wild Honey is harvested by indigenous groups in Palawan, offering a unique flavor shaped by the region's diverse flora. Herrencia's Pure Wild Honey, a family-owned business in Las Piñas, and San Pedro Bee Farm in Laguna are other examples of small-scale honey producers. Supporting these enterprises through effective hornet management programs is essential for the survival of our honey industry. Early intervention is the key to controlling hornet infestations. With the collaboration of government agencies, private sector partners, and agricultural institutions, we can protect our honeybees and ensure the continued growth of our honey industry. By taking decisive action now, we will prevent this looming threat from turning into a full-blown crisis. The time to act is now — let’s declare a war against hornets before they take over our fields and threaten our livelihoods. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-11-2025

TOWARDS A WHOLISTIC APPROACH TO RICE SECURITY

TOWARDS A WHOLISTIC APPROACH TO RICE SECURITY Rice security and rice sufficiency are two sides of the same coin. But I wonder, is anyone in the government thinking about a wholistic approach to our rice security? Let me tell you what I mean by that. Simply put, we will never achieve rice security unless we achieve rice sufficiency. By that, I mean sufficiency through production, not importation. Never believe anyone who claims that we have rice security just because we import rice. And certainly, do not believe anyone who claims that we have food security simply because we have enough rice supplies. Food security means more than just rice. What else is there to eat if we only have rice? I am neither an economist nor a statistician, but I can count, just like any grade school graduate. Rice Production and Demand The Philippines produced approximately 19.96 million metric tons of palay in 2021. The Department of Agriculture estimates our annual rice demand at 15.14 million metric tons. On paper, this suggests a surplus of 4.82 million metric tons. But reality tells a different story. Only about 70% of palay becomes milled rice. Using this figure, our estimated 19.96 million metric tons of palay yields only around 13.97 million metric tons of rice. Already, we are short by about 1.17 million metric tons. Adding to this problem are post-harvest losses. An estimated 10% of palay is lost due to drying on roads. That brings down our usable palay to 17.96 million metric tons. Further losses occur due to poor milling efficiency, reducing the yield to around 17.06 million metric tons of milled rice. Post-harvest losses from pests and moisture account for another 5%, leaving us with only about 16.2 million metric tons. To fill the gap, the Philippines imported approximately 2.9 million metric tons of rice in 2022. Even with imports, our buffer stock remains slim. The government claims that having a 15-day buffer stock is sufficient for food security. But I disagree. Fifteen days is too short. Perhaps it should be 15 months? Achieving Rice Sufficiency If we are serious about food security, we need to become a net exporter of rice. To do that, we should aim to produce at least 30 million metric tons per year. Is this achievable? Countries like Thailand produce about 34 million metric tons annually, and Myanmar follows with approximately 24 million metric tons. There is no reason why the Philippines cannot match or even surpass these figures. Rice farmers have consistently called for post-harvest facilities and farm-to-market roads. It is high time we meet these demands. Proper drying facilities, grains storage systems, and efficient transportation are essential. Beyond roads, we need a reliable network of farm-to-market vehicles. Modern rice mills must replace outdated ones to minimize losses and improve production yield. Innovative Solutions We must also look beyond traditional freshwater irrigation. Rain-fed upland rice farming and the cultivation of saline-tolerant rice varieties in coastal areas and swamplands offer viable alternatives. Additionally, cold storage facilities for rice could extend shelf life and reduce spoilage. Implementing shared post-harvest facilities like silos would further reduce storage losses. And why not consider a program to retire and replace inefficient rice mills? Promoting Responsible Consumption On the consumption side, we should revive the “half rice” and “clean plate” campaigns to minimize food waste. In the past, the government even offered rewards for those who eliminated rats. A modernized pest control initiative could help mitigate the substantial losses caused by rodents. Policy Support and Implementation Finally, we need Congress to act. If reversing the devolution agricultural programs is impractical, lawmakers could augment the Department of Agriculture’s budget to support rice production initiatives. Special funds can be allocated for the construction of post-harvest facilities, distribution of modern rice mills, and the promotion of efficient rice storage solutions. A Special Task Force or Technical Working Group should be established to explore making post-harvest infrastructure mandatory in all rice-producing provinces. A more integrated and proactive approach is essential to ensure genuine rice and food security. Rice security is not just about having enough rice. It is about producing enough rice, storing it effectively, and ensuring it reaches our tables efficiently. Only then can we confidently say that we are truly rice secure. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-10-2025

MANDATORY PEDIATRIC WARDS

MANDATORY PEDIATRIC WARDS In most countries worldwide, it is a standard practice to have pediatric wards in hospitals, often mandatory in many cases. Pediatric wards provide specialized care to children, ensuring their unique medical needs are met. Here in the Philippines, many private hospitals follow this practice, but the same cannot be said for government hospitals. While some government hospitals do have pediatric wards, it appears that most do not. Specifically, many provincial hospitals may have them, but not all. Given the critical importance of pediatric healthcare, it should be common sense that all public hospitals have dedicated pediatric wards. Disparities in Pediatric Care Provincial hospitals are theoretically more equipped and capable than district hospitals. However, if not all provincial hospitals have pediatric wards, it is reasonable to assume that district hospitals face even greater challenges in establishing these facilities. Despite the devolution of health services, the Department of Health (DOH) still provides partial financial support to local hospitals. However, this assistance is insufficient, leaving many provincial and district hospitals ill-equipped and understaffed. Without adequate funding, pediatric wards often remain low on the priority list. Legislative Action and Funding Reversing the devolution policy may be difficult, but Congress can still play a significant role in supporting pediatric healthcare. Lawmakers could consider augmenting the DOH’s budget to increase subsidies for local hospitals. Another practical solution is the creation of a special fund dedicated to establishing and maintaining pediatric wards. To further this cause, a Task Force or Technical Working Group (TWG) could be formed to study and recommend policies that would make pediatric wards mandatory in all public hospitals. Such a body could conduct assessments to identify gaps in pediatric care and propose actionable solutions. Comprehensive Pediatric Care Pediatric wards should not only provide treatment for illnesses and injuries but also offer prenatal and postnatal care for mothers and infants. Malnutrition, stunting, and wasting are prevalent issues among Filipino children, and well-functioning pediatric wards can play a pivotal role in addressing these concerns. Furthermore, the government could incentivize the development of multidisciplinary pediatric teams, ensuring that young patients receive holistic care. This includes access to pediatricians, nutritionists, social workers, and mental health professionals. Learning from Existing Models Several provincial hospitals, such as the Bataan General Hospital and Medical Center, Bulacan Medical Center, and Cebu Provincial Hospital, have established pediatric wards. Additionally, national hospitals like the Philippine Children's Medical Center (PCMC) and the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) provide exemplary pediatric services. These models can serve as a benchmark for expanding pediatric care across the country. Conclusion The absence of pediatric wards in many government hospitals is a glaring issue that demands immediate attention. It is not merely a matter of infrastructure but a fundamental commitment to ensuring the well-being of the nation’s children. By mandating the establishment of pediatric wards in all public hospitals, Congress can take a significant step towards equitable healthcare for all Filipino children. Let us recognize pediatric healthcare as a national priority. Every child deserves access to specialized care, and every hospital should be equipped to provide it. Establishing mandatory pediatric wards is not just a necessity—it is a moral obligation. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-09-2025

ESTABLISHING A NATIONAL GERIATRIC MEDICAL CENTER

ESTABLISHING A NATIONAL GERIATRIC MEDICAL CENTER The Philippines has established itself as a leader in providing specialized healthcare services through its national centers of excellence. Institutions such as the Philippine Heart Center, the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, the National Orthopedic Hospital, and the Philippine Children's Medical Center (PCMC) have long served as benchmarks in their respective fields. However, a glaring gap remains: the absence of a National Geriatric Medical Center (NGMC). While the country does have a National Center for Geriatric Health (NCGH), it is merely an outpatient clinic attached to the Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center (JRRMMC). Without its own independent infrastructure and dedicated funding, the NCGH struggles to meet the growing demands of our aging population. Patients requiring inpatient care are left competing with other patients for hospital beds, exacerbating the burden on JRRMMC's resources. A Missed Opportunity Over the years, lawmakers have introduced several bills to establish a National Geriatric Medical Center, yet none have progressed beyond the committee level. This lack of legislative support reflects a troubling underappreciation of geriatric care needs, despite the rapidly increasing number of senior citizens. According to the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), there will be an estimated 11.7 million senior citizens by 2025, rising to 16.8 million by 2035. The demand for specialized geriatric care will only intensify as the population ages. Establishing an NGMC would be a significant step toward ensuring the dignity and well-being of our elderly. Geriatric Age: Defining the Scope The World Health Organization (WHO) defines geriatric age as starting at 65 years. However, in the Philippines, the legal definition of a senior citizen begins at 60 years under the Expanded Senior Citizens Act of 2010 (Republic Act No. 9994). In the interest of clarity and inclusivity, it is reasonable to align our definition of geriatric age with our existing laws and recognize age 60 and above for geriatric care services. Why We Need a National Geriatric Medical Center 1. Independent Operations and Budget: The NGMC should operate as an independent institution with its own budgetary allocation from Congress. This autonomy will ensure focused management and effective service delivery. 2. Specialized Research and Training: Like other centers of excellence, the NGMC should establish a research division to advance studies in geriatric medicine. It should also serve as a teaching hospital to train healthcare professionals in the specialized care of elderly patients. 3. Referral and Outreach System: An electronic referral network should be established to allow public and private hospitals to refer geriatric patients to the NGMC, streamlining access to specialized care. 4. Robust Outpatient and Inpatient Services: The center should have a fully equipped outpatient department, as well as ample inpatient facilities to cater to both acute and long-term geriatric care needs. 5. Telemedicine Capabilities: To bridge the geographical divide, the NGMC should implement a telemedicine program that provides remote consultations and follow-ups, ensuring access to healthcare for senior citizens in underserved regions. A Call to Action Countries like Japan, Sweden, and Germany have established world-class geriatric care systems, recognizing the importance of addressing the complex health challenges faced by their aging populations. The Philippines must follow suit. Senate Bill No. 27, filed by Senator Ramon Bong Revilla Jr., envisions the creation of a National Center for Geriatric Health and Research Institute (NCGHRI), which would serve as the nation’s leading teaching and research hospital specializing in geriatric care. Additionally, various House bills have proposed the creation of regional geriatric centers. Such initiatives deserve our full support. We could pick up from where he left off. Our elderly have dedicated their lives to building this nation. It is now our responsibility to ensure that they receive the care and respect they deserve. Establishing the National Geriatric Medical Center is not only a healthcare imperative – it is a moral one. Let us urge our lawmakers to prioritize the health and well-being of our senior citizens. The time to act is now. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 05-08-2025