PROTOCOL AFTER USING POLICE WEAPONS

PROTOCOL AFTER USING POLICE WEAPONS My dear countrymen, out of curiosity, I used an artificial intelligence (AI) engine to find out what is the protocol after policemen use their weapons, and here are the unedited results: START QUOTE: In the Philippines, the protocol for police officers after using weapons is outlined in the Philippine National Police (PNP) Operational Procedures Manual. Here are the key steps: 1. Immediate Reporting: The officer involved must immediately report the incident to their superior officer. 2. Securing the Scene: The scene of the incident must be secured to preserve evidence and ensure the safety of all individuals present. 3. Medical Assistance: If anyone is injured, the officer must provide or arrange for immediate medical assistance. 4. Investigation: An investigation is conducted to determine the circumstances surrounding the use of the weapon. This includes collecting evidence, interviewing witnesses, and reviewing the actions of the officer involved. 5. Documentation: Detailed reports must be prepared, documenting the incident, the use of the weapon, and the actions taken by the officer. 6. Review and Evaluation: The incident is reviewed by higher authorities to evaluate the appropriateness of the officer's actions and to determine if any further action is required, such as disciplinary measures or additional training. These steps ensure accountability and transparency in the use of force by police officers, aligning with the principles of human rights and public safety. END QOUTE Based on what you know, does the PNP follow these rules of protocol? If so, where are the records of these reports or investigations if ever? According to that same AI engine, “the Philippine National Police (PNP) has an Internal Affairs Service (IAS). The IAS was established under Republic Act No. 8551, also known as the PNP Reform and Reorganization Act of 1998. Its primary role is to investigate infractions allegedly committed by PNP members and ensure police discipline and accountability. The IAS functions as an independent, impartial, and objective investigative and adjudicatory body within the PNP. It conducts inspections, audits, and investigations to address misconduct and promote professionalism within the police force.” Aside from the IAS, the PNP is also under the oversight and supervision of the National Police Commission (NAPOLCOM), thus making the NAPOLCOM an extra layer of assurance that the protocol would be followed and implemented? Not to forget, the PNP is also under the oversight and supervision of the DILG, which is a good and extra layer of transparency. Certainly not a duplication, but a welcome addition, if you ask me. Based on the protocol that was outlined earlier, it goes without saying that if a weapon was fired by a policeman during an operation, he or she and the weapon must undergo a paraffin test. Under the rules of some foreign police forces, the weapon must be surrendered as part of the evidence, which must be fully investigated. As I understand it, these protocols are not only useful for the protection of the human rights of the victims, but they could also protect the legal rights of the policemen, as they are accused of wrongdoing. This is also a good way to determine if the victim really had a weapon or not, and whether he or she really put up a fight or not. Your friend, IKE SENERES/12-12-24/visit my blog senseneres.blogspot.com