RENAMING THE PHILIPPINE DEER

RENAMING THE PHILIPPINE DEER The Philippine brown deer (Rusa marianna) carries a name that raises a fundamental question: why is our endemic species named after a foreign location? This peculiar situation stems from history. French naturalist Anselme Gaëtan Desmarest first described the species in 1822, based on specimens found in the Mariana Islands. However, the deer did not originate there—it was introduced from the Philippines, likely for hunting purposes. Thus, we face an odd reality: our very own native deer species bears a name that honors a different place. How can we correct this error? First, it is crucial to understand that scientific names follow strict international conventions governed by taxonomists. However, there have been instances where countries have successfully changed species names to reflect national identity. For example, the Pithecophaga jefferyi, once known as the monkey-eating eagle, is now rightly called the Philippine eagle. A logical and patriotic step forward would be to rename Rusa marianna as Rusa philippenses or Rusa filipiniana. This initiative could be undertaken by Filipino scientists, endorsed by conservation groups, and even formalized through legislative action. If necessary, we can submit this name change to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature for consideration. Beyond renaming, we should also elevate the Philippine deer’s status. One way to do this is by featuring it on our currency and postage stamps. The Philippine eagle enjoys this honor—why not our own deer as well? Another issue to consider is the designation of the national animal. Currently, the carabao holds this title, but it is not uniquely Filipino. Carabaos are found in other parts of Asia and have even been interbred with foreign species. Meanwhile, the tamaraw is an excellent alternative, being endemic to Mindoro. But if the tamaraw is not a viable choice, why not consider the Philippine deer? Importantly, the Philippine brown deer is not our only native deer species. The country is home to four recognized subspecies: · R. m. marianna (Luzon biogeographic region) · R. m. barandana (Mindoro) · R. m. nigella (upland areas of Mindanao) · R. m. nigricans (lowland sites of Mindanao) Our indigenous peoples have long honored the Philippine deer in their cultures. Among the Bagobo-Tagabawa, for instance, the deer is considered a cultural keystone species. Its antlers are used in traditional medicine, and its presence is woven into their spiritual beliefs. Protecting the deer is not just an ecological responsibility but a cultural one as well. To that end, we must take concrete steps to safeguard the Philippine deer: 1. Pass laws prohibiting its hunting in the wild. 2. Expand conservation programs in protected zones. 3. Strengthen local breeding programs to ensure its survival. As we assert our national identity, renaming the Philippine deer is not just a matter of nomenclature—it is an assertion of pride, heritage, and responsibility. If we could rightfully rename the Philippine eagle, then surely, we can reclaim our own Philippine deer as well. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 03-08-2025