OTHER SOLUTIONS TO THE METRO TRAFFIC PROBLEM

OTHER SOLUTIONS TO THE METRO TRAFFIC PROBLEM Metro Manila’s traffic congestion is no longer just an inconvenience—it has become a full-blown crisis with severe economic, environmental, and public health consequences. The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) estimates that the country loses billions of pesos daily due to lost productivity, wasted fuel, and time stuck in traffic. While infrastructure projects such as subways and expressways are often touted as long-term solutions, we must also explore other, less costly and more immediate strategies. Beyond building new roads, we need to rethink policies, behaviors, and enforcement systems. Here are four alternative and complementary solutions that can help mitigate the traffic problem in Metro Manila. 1. Stricter Enforcement of Emissions Laws One underrated but highly impactful approach is the strict enforcement of vehicle emissions regulations. A significant portion of vehicles clogging Metro Manila’s roads are old, poorly maintained, and are smoke-belching. Not only do they contribute to air pollution—exacerbating respiratory illnesses and harming vulnerable populations—but their deteriorating condition also makes them more prone to breakdowns, which cause further traffic delays. Enforcing emission laws more rigorously, including random roadside checks and annual inspections, would reduce the number of unroadworthy vehicles and encourage motorists to maintain their vehicles properly or retire them altogether. This policy simultaneously addresses both traffic and public health concerns. 2. Database of Traffic Violators Technology can play a vital role in enforcing discipline on our roads. A centralized, nationwide database of traffic law violators—linked to their license number and vehicle registration—would help ensure accountability. Through this database, drivers with multiple offenses can face escalated penalties, including license suspension or revocation. The current lack of coordination among enforcement agencies leads to inefficiencies and allows habitual violators to slip through the cracks. Integrating this database with a point system and publicly available records could deter bad behavior and promote more responsible driving. 3. Stricter Driver’s License Issuance At present, the standards for acquiring a driver’s license in the Philippines remain relatively lax. Too many unqualified individuals—some of whom may not even understand traffic signs or defensive driving practices—are given licenses. This contributes to erratic, undisciplined, and unsafe driving, which in turn causes accidents and gridlocks. The Land Transportation Office (LTO) should raise the bar by improving both the theoretical and practical tests, instituting psychological assessments, and requiring mandatory training through accredited driving schools. Quality, not quantity, must be the priority. 4. Higher Insurance Premiums for Errant Drivers Just as in other countries, insurance rates in the Philippines should reflect driver behavior. Motorists who have been involved in accidents or have multiple violations should be charged higher premiums. This will serve as a financial disincentive for careless or reckless driving. On the flip side, law-abiding drivers should be rewarded with lower premiums. Insurance companies, in partnership with government traffic agencies, can implement this system to help influence behavior through market-based mechanisms. In conclusion, solving Metro Manila’s traffic problem requires a multifaceted approach that goes beyond physical infrastructure. Discipline, accountability, and enforcement are critical pillars of effective traffic management. These complementary solutions, if executed properly, can bring about real and measurable change in our daily commuting lives—making our cities safer, cleaner, and more efficient for everyone. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 06-28-2025