WHY ARE FAULTY BRAKES KILLING US?

WHY ARE FAULTY BRAKES KILLING US? Let me begin with a question we should all be asking, especially those in power: Why are so many Filipinos dying on our roads because of faulty brakes? It’s a question that has haunted me every time I read another tragic news report: a bus plunges into a ravine, a truck rams into a row of cars, a jeepney overturns. Often, the explanation is predictable and painfully repetitive— “nawalan ng preno.” But I must ask: is this still acceptable in 2025? The Silent Epidemic on Our Roads Our roads are death traps not just because of driver error or traffic congestion, but because we continue to allow unsafe vehicles to operate. Brake failure is not fate—it’s negligence. It’s a mechanical failure that is almost always preventable. That’s why I wrote a letter to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., asking hard questions and offering practical suggestions. Because if we won’t fix this problem now, we’re simply allowing the next accident to happen. Do We Even Know the Numbers? First, where’s the data? We need the Department of Transportation or LTO to show how many road accidents over the past five years have been attributed to brake failure. And how many of those resulted in deaths or permanent injuries? Without data, how can we craft real solutions? Inspection: Where Is It? Is there not a national system for checking the roadworthiness of vehicles, especially brakes? I know the LTO has a Motor Vehicle Inspection System (MVIS)—but where are these stations located? How many vehicles go through them? Are they mandatory or optional? And let’s be honest: how many vehicles, especially trucks and buses, pass without being properly checked? The poor condition of many public and even government-owned vehicles is an open secret. “Pitstop” Safety Stations: A Simple but Life-Saving Idea What if we set up mobile or fixed safety inspection “pitstops” along major highways, especially in accident-prone areas? Vehicles—especially cargo trucks and passenger buses—could be randomly or regularly pulled over for quick checks on brakes, lights, tires, and weight. Is this too ambitious? Not really. We already have checkpoints and weighing stations in some provinces. Why not repurpose or upgrade them into safety hubs? Accountability Must Be Enforced We need stronger penalties for operators and drivers who neglect basic vehicle maintenance. If an accident occurs and it’s proven that a vehicle’s brakes were defective, then the owners, mechanics, and even the certifying authorities must be held accountable. And what of the victims? Are they even insured? Many passengers who die or are injured in these accidents get little to no compensation. Shouldn’t there be mandatory insurance coverage for all public utility vehicles, covering brake-related incidents? Special Licenses, Certified Mechanics, Weight Control If brake failure is often linked to heavy vehicles, then why aren’t we requiring special licenses for truck and bus drivers—complete with skills training in emergency braking, downshifting, and load management? And speaking of load management, overloading is another silent killer. It’s no secret that many trucks carry more than they’re allowed. This overstresses brakes and tires. It’s illegal, and yet, it's everywhere. Another big issue? Mechanics. Right now, anyone with a wrench can open up a truck’s brake system and call themselves a “mechanic.” Shouldn’t we require certification for those who work on the most critical components of public and cargo vehicles? Safety Is Not a Luxury Some might say all these proposals would be expensive. But how expensive is a life? Let me be blunt: If we can afford endless road-widening projects and overpriced traffic lights, we can surely afford to build a functional road safety system. The public has a right to safe travel. But rights are meaningless if they’re not protected by policy and enforcement. Will the President Act? In his many speeches, President Marcos has spoken of modernization, digitalization, and innovation. But I respectfully ask: can we not apply some of that same energy to saving lives on our roads? Road safety isn’t glamorous. It doesn’t make headlines or ribbon-cutting ceremonies. But if even one life is saved because of better inspections, tougher enforcement, or smarter policy—isn’t that worth more than any infrastructure photo-op? It’s time we stopped normalizing brake failure as just another tragic quirk of Philippine roads. It's not fate. It's fixable. And the fix should begin now. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-25-2025

WHO CARES FOR THE CAREGIVERS?

WHO CARES FOR THE CAREGIVERS? Let’s talk about heroes. Not the kind who wear capes or swing from buildings, but the ones who wear scrubs and work 12-hour shifts in hospitals that are underfunded, understaffed, and—let’s be blunt—undervalued. We called them frontliners during the pandemic. We applauded them. We gave them hashtags. We even offered them pizza and a few months’ worth of discounts. But three years after the worst of COVID-19, I have one simple question: how are our health workers doing now? Sadly, the answer is: not much better than before. The Applause Has Faded—Now What? Let’s cut through the rhetoric. If we truly believe our doctors, nurses, medical technologists, midwives, ambulance drivers, janitors, and admin staff are heroes, then where are the tangible rewards? What have we really done to make their lives easier? I sent a letter to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. asking just that. Here’s what I wanted to know: Where’s the job security? Many government hospital workers are still on contract of service or job order status. They wear the same uniforms, carry the same risks, and do the same tasks as their regular counterparts—but without tenure or benefits. Why the mismatch in pay and roles? Nurses with board licenses are sometimes hired as nursing attendants just to fill vacancies. Is this how we treat professionals who trained for years to save our lives? Where is the protection? During the pandemic, many made do with makeshift face masks. I’m not making that up—some literally used cloths and plastic sheets. Do we expect them to fight future outbreaks with the same lack of basic gear? Do they even get rest? Staff quarters are a luxury in most public hospitals. After grueling shifts, some health workers either nap on benches or commute home half-asleep. Can we not provide them a dignified place to sleep? What about life insurance? If a health worker dies from a hospital-acquired infection, is their family covered? Or do they just get another “hero” certificate? Where’s the gratitude now? Remember when they were given free meals, discounts, and ride shares during the pandemic? Most of those were just marketing gimmicks. Can we institutionalize real, consistent support for our medical workers? A Long List of Questions—Still Waiting for Answers I raised 13 specific points in my letter to the President, ranging from salary issues to free transportation. My logic is simple: If we want to keep our healthcare system afloat, we need to keep our health workers at home. Because right now, they’re leaving. Every day. Nurses, especially, are flying out to the UK, Germany, Australia, and the US. Can we blame them? If you're underpaid, overworked, and treated like you’re replaceable, why would you stay? No Healthcare Without Health Workers It baffles me how we keep talking about Universal Healthcare when the very people who will implement it are treated so poorly. You can pass all the Universal Healthcare Acts you want, but if there’s no nurse to take your blood pressure or doctor to read your chart, what’s the point? Are there laws in place already? Yes. Are they being implemented? Rarely. Is Congress doing something about it? Occasionally—but sporadic hearings and symbolic visits aren’t enough. We need sustained, systemic change. A Call for a National Healthcare Workforce Strategy What we need is a comprehensive national plan to improve the lives of medical workers across all levels. I’m not just talking about high-profile doctors. I’m talking about the entire team—from the ER nurse to the utility worker disinfecting hospital rooms. This plan should include: Regularization of qualified health workers in public hospitals. Salary standardization and proper placement for all. Provision of PPE and training in every facility. Dedicated rest areas and affordable food options. Free or discounted transport. Government-provided life and health insurance. This isn’t just about fairness. It’s about public health survival. The Question Remains President Marcos has said he wants a “fierce” and “intense” government. Well, I ask: Can we be fierce in protecting our health workers? Can we be intense in giving them the respect and compensation they deserve? If we can’t protect those who protect us, what kind of society are we building? It’s time to move beyond applause. Let’s act. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-24-2025

TURNING INVASIVE WEEDS INTO GREEN GOLD

TURNING INVASIVE WEEDS INTO GREEN GOLD There’s an old saying that goes, “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure.” But in this case, it’s more accurate to say that one country’s aquatic menace could become another country’s environmental solution. In Kenya, a young engineering student named Joseph Nguthiru came up with a brilliant idea—one that could potentially clean up both pollution and poverty. Through his company HyaPak Ecotech Limited, he has developed a way to turn water hyacinths into biodegradable plastic. Yes, you read that right—those pesky floating plants clogging waterways can now become eco-friendly seedling bags, wrappers, straws, tumblers, and even party plates. These biodegradable products decompose within 3 to 12 months, leaving zero plastic waste behind. Now, I ask you: Why can’t we do that here in the Philippines? From Problem Plant to Planet Protector Water hyacinths are no strangers to us. We see them blanketing our rivers and lakes, particularly in Laguna de Bay, where they choke marine life, stall boats, and destroy livelihoods—especially for fishermen. Local governments and even well-meaning NGOs have tried to turn this invasive plant into raw material for furniture, bags, and handicrafts. That’s all good. But let’s be honest: the supply always outpaces the demand. The hyacinths grow faster than we can turn them into anything useful. That’s why this Kenyan innovation caught my attention. It doesn’t just “use” water hyacinths—it turns them into biodegradable plastic, a material we can use daily and repeatedly. And better yet, it replaces petroleum-based plastic, which is one of the biggest polluters in the world. If Kenya can do it, why can’t we? We already have the raw materials floating around by the ton—literally clogging our lakes and rivers. What we need is the political will to explore, adopt, and adapt this technology. A Few Simple Steps Could Spark Big Change I respectfully propose a few simple actions that can get this ball rolling: 1. Talk to the Innovator. Let’s have the Philippine Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya contact Mr. Nguthiru. A simple conversation could lead to a collaboration. We don’t need to reinvent the wheel—we just need to bring it here. 2. Get the DENR on Board. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) should craft a roadmap to integrate this technology into our environmental programs—especially for waterway rehabilitation and solid waste management. 3. Public-Private Partnerships. Let’s encourage collaboration with startups and social enterprises who are ready to take this on. Think of the jobs this could create in local communities—collecting, processing, producing. Circular economy in action. 4. Back it Up with Science. The Department of Science and Technology (DOST) can lead the research to fine-tune the process for local conditions. Our climate, our water hyacinths, our market—all of these can help shape a uniquely Filipino version of HyaPak. 5. Enable It Through Policy. Perhaps the LLDA (Laguna Lake Development Authority) and relevant local government units can craft ordinances that facilitate the collection and transport of water hyacinths, rather than treating them as waste. From Weed to Wealth, from Waste to Wonder To President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., this is the kind of innovation your administration should champion. You’ve often spoken about sustainability, climate resilience, and inclusive growth. This checks all the boxes. It fights pollution, supports biodiversity, boosts local economies, and aligns perfectly with your goal of creating a “fierce and intense” government that delivers results. As citizens, we often feel helpless when facing environmental degradation. But here is one clear, practical, and achievable solution. Let’s not miss the boat—again. It’s about time we viewed our problems as potential, our weeds as wealth, and our waste as opportunity. In the words of HyaPak's slogan: “Nature to Nature.” The answer to our plastic problem may just be floating in our lakes. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-23-2025

LET’S RECYCLE USING REVERSE VENDING MACHINES

LET’S RECYCLE USING REVERSE VENDING MACHINES It’s time we stop treating garbage as garbage—and start seeing it for what it really is: an opportunity. I’m referring to the untapped potential of Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs), an innovation already proving its worth right here in the Philippines. These machines accept plastic bottles and aluminum cans in exchange for points, discounts, or incentives. Think of it as a recycling ATM—deposit trash, get rewarded. It’s simple, it’s effective, and it’s already working. One local company, Spurway Enterprises. has already installed RVMs in San Juan City and several other locations nationwide, proving that the concept isn’t just theoretical. It’s real, and it’s successful—not just in collecting recyclables but also in selling them. That’s what a circular economy looks like: turning waste into wealth while cleaning up our communities. Spurway Enterprises is now knocking on the door of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and the European Union’s Green Economy Programme in the Philippines (GEPP). The EU has pledged 60 million Euros in green development funding, and the RVM initiative fits perfectly into the program’s goals: promoting sustainability, innovation, and green enterprise development. Now the question is: Will this funding be made available to those already doing the work on the ground? Let’s hope so. Because RVMs could be a cornerstone in solving one of our most stubborn problems: solid waste management. RVMs Aren’t Just Tech—They’re Tools for Empowerment But this isn’t just about machines. It’s about empowering local entrepreneurs. Each RVM can become the centerpiece of an eco-enterprise owned and operated by Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)—the lifeblood of our economy. The collection and sale of recyclable materials can be run by small traders and junk shop owners, creating jobs at the grassroots level. This is sustainability with a human face: machines backed by community-driven enterprises. Even better, these RVMs can also serve as information hubs. Equipped with video screens, they can display advertisements to generate extra revenue, making them self-sustaining in the long run. They can also be programmed to show public service announcements (PSAs) from local or national government agencies—like the DTI, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, or the Department of the Interior and Local Government. This is how we marry environmental protection with economic empowerment. A Role for CREATE MORE and the SIPP The potential of RVMs extends into the realm of strategic investment. Under the CREATE MORE Act (RA 12066) and its accompanying Strategic Investments Priority Plan (SIPP), projects that promote innovation, sustainability, and inclusivity are eligible for incentives. So here’s the next step: RVMs should be officially recognized under these frameworks. The DTI and the Board of Investments (BOI) should offer guidance to local innovators on how to qualify for these incentives. Let’s not make them jump through hoops. Let’s clear the path. Where Policy Meets Practicality The technology exists. The local proof-of-concept exists. The community business model exists. The government’s green funding exists. Now it’s just a matter of connecting the dots. This is where leadership matters. The National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) should embrace RVMs as a key strategy in local waste management plans. LGUs should integrate these machines into barangay-level solid waste programs. And yes, the Office of the President should take a close look at this, because environmental protection and innovation are national concerns. If we do it right, we’ll not only reduce plastic waste—we’ll create jobs, stimulate entrepreneurship, and redefine recycling in the Philippines. Closing the Loop It’s ironic how we throw things away, thinking they’re worthless. But that “waste” could be a source of income, awareness, and empowerment—if we close the loop. Let’s move past the pilot projects and press releases. Let’s make RVMs a mainstream solution, backed by policy, funding, and local enterprise. If we want to clean up our environment, we can’t rely on slogans. We need systems. RVMs are one such system, already proven and waiting to be scaled. So, here’s my message to policymakers, agencies, and funders: don’t let this opportunity go to waste. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-22-2025

LET US AGAIN BECOME A NET EXPORTER OF RICE, AS WE HAVE DONE THAT BEFORE

LET US AGAIN BECOME A NET EXPORTER OF RICE, AS WE HAVE DONE THAT BEFORE We’ve just earned a title no Filipino should be proud of: the world’s top rice importer in 2024. That’s right—despite our rich agricultural heritage, ideal climate, and millions of rice farmers, we’ve overtaken everyone in buying what we used to grow ourselves. If this doesn’t ring alarm bells in the highest halls of power, then we may be deaf to our own national survival. A powerful new report from the Integrated Rural Development Foundation (IRDF), co-authored by respected experts like Dr. Ted Mendoza—whom I know personally and fully vouch for—reveals how we ended up in this crisis. It isn’t just a matter of bad weather or unlucky pests. This is about bad policy and broken systems. We’re Not Just Losing Rice—We’re Losing Land Dr. Mendoza points to a painful truth: over half a million hectares of prime irrigated rice land have been converted into malls, subdivisions, factories, and highways. That’s enough to feed the nation and still export rice—if we had protected it. This is why I strongly believe it’s time for the government to ban the conversion of irrigated land into non-agricultural use. These lands are the heart of our food security. Losing them is like tearing out our own lungs and expecting to breathe. Just as we have protected our forests, marine sanctuaries, and national parks under the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS), we should pass a similar law—call it the National Irrigated Areas Protection System (NIAPS)—to give legal protection to all irrigated and productive farmland. Better yet, let’s make this part of the long-overdue National Land Use Act. This landmark law has been sleeping in Congress for years, and it's time for the Marcos administration to wake it up. From Rice Sufficiency to Rice Surplus We need to stop thinking of rice imports as “normal” or “necessary.” They are not. They are a symptom of policy failure. What we need instead is a long-term target for rice sufficiency—and beyond that, rice surplus. We should be able to export high-quality, Filipino-grown rice to the world again. And to do that, we must complete the agrarian reform process not just by handing out land, but by making that land productive. Every land reform beneficiary deserves access to irrigation, farm-to-market roads, modern tools, and reliable support services. In places where freshwater is scarce, the government must now invest in desalination technology. This isn’t science fiction—it’s already being done in countries with far fewer water resources than ours. With today’s climate challenges, water security is food security. Let’s Listen to Our Scientists The government must not operate in an echo chamber of bureaucrats. There are experts like Dr. Mendoza who have spent decades studying the science and economics of rice. He, and others like him, should be actively consulted in crafting national strategy. In fact, let’s mobilize all Filipino scientists who can contribute to solving the rice crisis—from soil experts to irrigation engineers, from crop breeders to GIS technologists. Speaking of which, why don’t we already have a national digital map of all irrigated lands? Using GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technology, we can map, monitor, and protect these vital areas from being lost to speculative real estate. The Real Enemy: Policy Neglect and Cartels The IRDF report is damning! Not only are farmers struggling with pests and floods, but many felt that they were abandoned by the National Food Authority, which reportedly refused to buy their produce as promised. Worse, farmgate prices have plummeted to just P11 to P12 per kilo, while it costs at least P17 to P18 to produce. No wonder farmers are quitting, and the youth want nothing to do with agriculture. Add to that the rice cartels, who hoard, manipulate prices, and entrap farmers in debt. This is not a free market. This is a captured market. And it’s bleeding both producers and consumers dry. The 2019 Rice Tariffication Law (RTL) was supposed to make rice affordable. It did not. It instead devastated local production. It’s time to replace RTL with a new law—the Rice Industry Sustainable Development Act (RISDA)—focused on self-reliance, climate resilience, and equitable market reforms. We also need a legally mandated support price—at least P25 per kilo of palay—so our farmers can survive, invest in their land, and inspire a new generation to plant rice, not abandon it. It’s Not Too Late, But It Soon Will Be Food security is not a matter of policy convenience—it’s a national security issue. If we cannot feed ourselves, we become vulnerable to the whims of foreign suppliers, volatile markets, and geopolitical instability. The Marcos administration must act boldly and swiftly. Declare irrigated rice lands as protected areas. Pass the National Land Use Act. Set a course for rice sufficiency and surplus. Consult scientists. Protect farmers. Break the monopolies. We are not just losing rice—we are losing our sovereignty. But with the right vision and the right policies, we can still reclaim it. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-21-2025

FROM COPRA TO VCO: TIME TO RETHINK OUR NATIONAL COCONUT STRATEGY

FROM COPRA TO VCO: TIME TO RETHINK OUR NATIONAL COCONUT STRATEGY The humble coconut—long dubbed the “tree of life”—is still at the center of our national livelihood and economy. Yet despite its rich potential, we continue to make decisions that yield low value, low income, and little long-term vision for our farmers. Case in point: the recent move by the Department of Agriculture (DA) to promote the use of copra meal as animal feed due to the global shortage of soybeans. While this may be a practical short-term solution, it is not a sustainable national strategy. We must ask: are we extracting the highest value from our coconuts, or are we stuck in outdated practices? The Copra Conundrum Let’s face it: making copra from fresh coconuts already causes value loss. When fresh coconut meat is dried into copra, much of the oil’s nutritional and economic value is degraded or wasted. Worse, copra is prone to contamination—from vermin to salmonella—which affects both human and animal health. Its shelf life and hygiene standards are simply not up to par in today's competitive market. While copra meal is sold cheaply as livestock feed, it represents the lowest rung in the value chain. It is a byproduct of a byproduct. Yes, it's better than waste—but we should be aiming higher. Cooking Oil vs. Virgin Coconut Oil On the next rung up is coconut cooking oil—particularly Refined, Bleached, and Deodorized (RBD) oil. It serves as a staple in homes and industries, both locally and abroad. The market is steady, but margins are not exactly eye-popping. It also requires refining infrastructure, and for small farmers and producers, that’s a high barrier to entry. At the top of the value chain sits Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO)—a premium product in the global health, food, and cosmetic markets. It requires no heavy refining and retains the coconut’s full natural benefits. It fetches significantly higher prices, especially in export markets. Yet despite its proven profitability, we have not gone all-in on promoting VCO as a national strategy. A Cabinet Cluster for Coconut Value Optimization Instead of relying on fragmented decisions by individual departments, it’s time for a unified strategy. I propose that the President establish a Cabinet Cluster for Coconut Industry Development and Value Optimization. This is more than just a policy group—it would be an empowered executive cluster with cross-sectoral coordination authority, similar to the clusters on food security, climate change, and digital infrastructure. Its core mandates should be: 1. Shifting the National Value Chain Focus Transition from low-value copra production to high-value coconut products like VCO, coco sugar, coconut flour, and functional health products. 2. Strengthening Farmer Participation Equip coconut farmers and cooperatives with training, technology, and access to decentralized VCO production methods. 3. Research and Development Mobilize the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) to develop new processing techniques, storage methods, and product diversification models. 4. Market Development and Branding Task the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to position Filipino VCO as a global premium brand, just like Thai rice or Colombian coffee. 5. Food Safety and Standards Through the Department of Health (DOH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), ensure that coconut products meet export-grade safety and labeling standards. 6. Inclusive Finance and Investment Engage the Department of Finance (DOF) and the Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA) to ensure that coconut levy funds are invested in VCO and value-added infrastructure, not in perpetuating the old copra system. 7. Agro-industrial Support Let the Department of Agriculture (DA) and the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) prioritize VCO production in farm-to-market programs, and make coconut diversification a centerpiece of rural development. This Cabinet Cluster must be chaired by no less than the Executive Secretary or directly by the President himself, to ensure national alignment and rapid implementation. Why It Matters This isn’t just about coconut products—it’s about uplifting millions of coconut farmers who remain among the poorest in the country. It’s about turning agricultural waste into wealth, and building a resilient, climate-smart economy. It’s also about strategic national planning. Why rely on foreign soybean imports when we can feed the world with high-value coconut products? Why settle for bulk exports when we can sell prestige-grade oils? Let’s remember that we are one of the top coconut-producing nations on Earth. That should mean something. But unless we evolve beyond copra and into full-value utilization, we will always be shortchanging ourselves. Final Thoughts Mr. President, instead of choosing between using copra for animal feeds or cooking oil, let’s choose the higher road. Let us invest in the future of coconut—and that future is in Virgin Coconut Oil and other high-value derivatives. Now is the time to convene a Cabinet Cluster dedicated to this purpose. Let us align our science, trade, agriculture, and health policies around a unified coconut strategy. In doing so, we don’t just build a stronger industry—we build a better life for every coconut farmer in the Philippines. The tree of life deserves nothing less. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 09-07-2025

WORMS VS. WASTE: HOW NATURE COULD HELP US BEAT PLASTIC POLLUTION

WORMS VS. WASTE: HOW NATURE COULD HELP US BEAT PLASTIC POLLUTION In the age-old war between humans and the mountains of plastic we’ve created, who would’ve thought that one of our strongest allies might be a humble worm? Yes, you read that right—waxworms, the small, squishy larvae of moths often used as fishing bait, are now at the center of a scientific breakthrough that could radically change how we manage plastic pollution. Two remarkable scientists—Dr. Federica Bertocchini from Spain and Dr. Christophe LeMoine from Canada—have uncovered a natural and sustainable method of breaking down polyethylene, the stubborn plastic found in shopping bags, food packaging, and countless other products that clutter our landfills and waterways. Nature’s Solution in a Worm’s Saliva Dr. Bertocchini, working at the Spanish National Research Council, discovered that two enzymes in waxworm saliva—Demetra and Ceres—can rapidly break down polyethylene. No need for high heat, complex machinery, or industrial pre-treatment. Just a natural compound doing what expensive recycling plants struggle to do. Meanwhile, Dr. LeMoine’s research at Brandon University in Canada revealed that gut bacteria in these worms also play a key role in degrading plastic—a microbial tag team, if you will. It’s a rare moment when science doesn’t invent the wheel but simply uncovers how nature has been spinning it all along. The implications are enormous. These biological processes don’t just break plastics into smaller pieces (as some mechanical processes do); they degrade them into simpler, potentially harmless compounds. This means fewer microplastics floating in our oceans and accumulating in our food chains. So Where Does the Philippines Come In? We are a plastic-dependent nation, and unfortunately, we’re also one of the biggest contributors to marine plastic pollution. Our archipelagic geography, paired with poor waste management infrastructure, makes it hard to avoid the plastic problem—even when we want to. But what if we stopped treating plastic waste as just garbage, and started treating it as feedstock for a natural solution? Here’s how we can act: 1. Start the Dialogue with Scientists The Department of Science and Technology (DOST) can lead the charge by reaching out to Dr. Bertocchini and Dr. LeMoine. Our embassies in Spain and Canada can facilitate collaboration. Let’s learn from the experts who made the discovery and bring that knowledge home. 2. Form a National Task Force This is more than a science project—it’s a potential industry. An interagency task force, led by the DOST and supported by the DENR, DTI, DA, and NEDA, could assess how we can adapt this technology to our waste streams. Think of it as planting seeds for an ecosystem of eco-startups, jobs, and cleaner cities. 3. Collaborate with Japan Japan is already researching waxworms in relation to plastic degradation. Given our strong ties with Japanese institutions, there’s room for technical exchanges, joint research, and pilot projects that can benefit both nations. 4. Localize the Tech With over 35,000 tons of waste generated daily in the Philippines, this enzyme-based solution could become part of an integrated plastic waste management strategy. It’s clean, scalable, and potentially revolutionary. Plus, it could generate green jobs—from worm farming to enzyme extraction and product development. Imagine community-based projects where plastic waste is treated with biodegradable enzymes instead of dumped into rivers or buried in landfills. It’s a future worth working toward. Turning the Tide We often look to high-tech fixes for low-tech problems. But sometimes, the answers are crawling under our noses—literally. Waxworms are not glamorous, but the enzymes in their bodies could give us a powerful, natural tool to reclaim our environment. This is not science fiction. It’s science fact. And with the right vision, leadership, and investment, the Philippines could lead Southeast Asia in enzyme-based plastic degradation technologies. That would be a legacy worth writing into our environmental history. So, let’s turn this story from a scientific curiosity into a national initiative. Let’s put worms to work—not just in compost pits, but on the front lines of environmental innovation. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-19-2025

SHOWTIME FOR THE PHILIPPINES: HOW FILIPINO FILMS CAN SHINE GLOBALLY

SHOWTIME FOR THE PHILIPPINES: HOW FILIPINO FILMS CAN SHINE GLOBALLY Something remarkable is happening on our screens. Filipino movies and series are no longer confined to local cinemas or late-night television—they are now showing up on global platforms like Netflix. Over 50 titles and counting. From indie gems to polished productions, the Philippines is quietly but steadily entering the world stage. But here’s the thing: this momentum needs more than applause—it needs a push. The global video streaming market, already worth over half a trillion dollars, is projected to balloon to $2.66 trillion by 2032, according to market forecasts. That's an 18.7% annual growth rate. In simpler terms: we’re in the middle of a gold rush, and we can’t afford to be standing on the sidelines with a camera and no budget. Don’t Just Celebrate—Support Other countries are already sprinting. Governments offer grants, tax breaks, and logistical help to boost their content industries and even attract foreign productions. We must do the same—but better and with Filipino flair. Prominent players like ABS-CBN and GMA Network, along with our many independent filmmakers, deserve more than applause. They need financial support, soft loans, and production-friendly policies that empower them to scale up their output without compromising quality. Let the FDCP and FAP Do More We already have key institutions in place—the Film Development Council of the Philippines (FDCP) and the Film Academy of the Philippines (FAP). But they're running on limited budgets while carrying enormous expectations. Let’s boost their funding so they can extend programs like FLIP (Film Location Incentive Program) and provide meaningful support to filmmakers at all levels. It’s time we stop asking them to do more with less. Exporting More Than Just Beauty Yes, our beaches are stunning. Our rice terraces are postcard perfect. And yes, they make great backdrops. But we’re not just selling scenery—we’re exporting stories, culture, and creativity. Filipino actors, directors, writers, and producers are world-class. If we market them right, the Philippines could become a sought-after destination for international co-productions. Think of it as the soft power equivalent of mangoes and remittances—only this time, it's cultural capital with global reach. Collaborate to Compete The global success of Hollywood, Bollywood, and Hallyu (Korea’s cultural wave) didn’t happen in isolation. They were built through strategic collaborations—co-productions, distribution deals, training exchanges, and joint ventures. Filipino creatives should be equipped and encouraged to pursue similar alliances. Imagine a Filipino Korean sci-fi drama. Or a Filipino American historical thriller. Or even a Southeast Asian horror anthology that goes viral. These aren’t pipe dreams—they’re untapped markets. A Strategy, Not Just Hope If we truly want to go global, we can’t just rely on “viral” hits or wait for another miracle festival win. We need a film export strategy—complete with marketing budgets, international distribution subsidies, and strong participation in global film festivals. We should be planting our flag not only at Cannes, Berlinale, and Venice—but also in newer venues like Busan, Toronto, and even the Oscars. Let the world know that Filipino storytelling travels well. Telling the Filipino Story, Globally We’ve already shown we can produce globally resonant content. Shows like Gameboys, Family of Two, and Outside have found their way into international viewership—because they’re honest, heartfelt, and human. Filipino stories, when told well, cut across borders. Now imagine what more we could achieve if those stories were better funded, better distributed, and better supported by policy. The Next Act: A Task Force for Film Here’s a simple proposal, that we form a presidential task force that brings together the FDCP, FAP, DFA, DTI, DOT, and major industry stakeholders like ABS-CBN and GMA. Let’s sit everyone at the same table and plan a national strategy—not just to promote Filipino films, but to create an ecosystem where world-class productions are the norm, not the exception. Filipino films are more than entertainment—they are ambassadors of our identity, our humor, our pain, our dreams. Let’s give them the stage they deserve. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-18-2025

GOODBYE PLASTIC, HELLO PLANET: TIME TO BAG THE OLD HABITS

GOODBYE PLASTIC, HELLO PLANET: TIME TO BAG THE OLD HABITS Let’s be honest—plastic bags are everywhere. From your neighborhood sari-sari store to high-end supermarkets, they're the default option for carrying everything from groceries to gadgets. But here’s the reality we can’t afford to ignore: plastic is choking our landfills, clogging our waterways, and poisoning our seas. The good news? The solution is already here—and it's biodegradable. The Philippines is ready to make the switch, if only our policies catch up with our potential. That’s why I propose that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. issue an Executive Order in 2025, encouraging retail establishments to adopt biodegradable shopping bags. Not just for show, but as a bold, doable step toward environmental sustainability that’s also good for business. We’ve talked for years about banning plastic but bans without alternatives simply shift the burden onto consumers and stall progress. What we need is transition, not disruption—and biodegradable bags are the bridge. Start Local, Think Big We already have Filipino companies like Oikos Sustainability Solutions (Oikos PH) manufacturing eco-friendly packaging options. Instead of relying on imported alternatives, why not prioritize homegrown solutions? If we support our own innovators, we create jobs, stimulate green entrepreneurship, and reduce our dependency on foreign materials. Standardize and Certify Of course, not all "biodegradable" bags are created equal. That’s why the Department of Trade and Industry’s Bureau of Philippine Standards (DTI-BPS) should step in to define clear guidelines—so that businesses and consumers can trust that what's being sold as "eco-friendly" truly is. The DTI can also curate a list of certified local manufacturers, while the Bureau of Customs can do the same for reputable importers. Incentivize the Switch As with any transition, cost can be a barrier. That’s where government incentives come in. Tax breaks, subsidies, or low-interest loans to biodegradable bag producers would spur innovation and drive prices down, making it easier for retailers to adopt these alternatives. Information is Power Let’s not forget the importance of public awareness. A joint campaign by DTI, DENR, and DILG could highlight the long-term benefits of switching to biodegradable bags—not just for the planet, but for everyday people. Let’s bring the conversation to markets, schools, malls, and online platforms. If consumers start asking for biodegradable options, retailers will have to follow. Secure the Supply Chain No bag can be made without raw materials. For starch-based bags, that means cassava, corn, and possibly even vegetable oils. Here, the Department of Agriculture (DA) can ensure local supply, while the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) explores sustainable production techniques and new innovations, such as mushroom-derived packaging or seaweed-based films. Going Global This isn't just a domestic opportunity—it’s an export one. With growing global demand for sustainable packaging, the DTI and DFA can work to open doors in international markets for Filipino-made biodegradable bags. We could soon be exporting sustainability, not just sugar and coconuts. A Model for Southeast Asia If we do this right, the Philippines can be a regional leader in environmental responsibility. A government-endorsed shift to biodegradable shopping bags would send a clear message: We are serious about our environment and smart about our economy. We don’t need to wait for a global summit or international treaty—we can act now. The Bottom Line This isn’t about banning convenience; it’s about redefining it. True convenience is not using plastic for 10 minutes and watching it pollute the planet for 1,000 years. True convenience is having options that don’t cost the Earth—literally. The nation looks to the Marcos administration not just to protect what is, but to shape what can be. This small yet powerful act—an EO to encourage biodegradable bags—could be a turning point in our fight against plastic pollution. So, let’s bag the excuses and embrace the alternatives. The future is biodegradable. Let’s make it national policy. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-17-2025

BIRD FLU: ACT NOW, NOT LATER

BIRD FLU: ACT NOW, NOT LATER We’ve just emerged from the worst global health crisis of our generation—and yet, another biological threat is already knocking on our doors. The name isn’t new, but the threat is very real: Bird Flu, or avian influenza, particularly the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain. This virus has long haunted poultry farms in Asia, but what makes it more dangerous now is its increasing ability to jump species—from birds to humans. With each new outbreak, it mutates, learns, and edges closer to sparking a full-scale epidemic. That’s why we need to prepare now, not scramble later. Let’s not forget that we are a poultry-loving country. From backyard farms to massive poultry operations, chickens are everywhere—and so are the risks. Poultry workers, especially those in dressing plants and live bird markets, are on the frontlines. If we don’t act early, they may be the first to pay the price. Here are practical, actionable steps the government should take to safeguard both public health and the poultry industry: 1. DA and DOH Must Work as One Bird Flu is zoonotic—it starts in animals and crosses over to humans. So, it’s not enough for the Department of Agriculture (DA) to handle poultry outbreaks while the Department of Health (DOH) waits for human infections. These two agencies must coordinate seamlessly. Health and agriculture are no longer separate silos in today’s viral world. 2. Monitor Transmission Hotspots We need regular surveillance of farms, slaughterhouses, and wet markets. These are not just economic zones—they’re potential viral launching pads. Early detection is the difference between containment and catastrophe. 3. Is Fried Chicken Safe? It may sound like a silly question—until it’s not. We need clear, science-backed studies on whether infected poultry can still pose a threat when cooked. The goal is not to induce panic, but to maintain consumer confidence with transparency. 4. Assess DOH Preparedness Let’s be honest—we were caught flat-footed by COVID-19. Let’s not repeat the same mistake. Is the DOH ready for a Bird Flu outbreak? Are hospitals trained? Is there enough protective gear for frontliners? Let’s audit now rather than apologize later. 5. Secure Vaccines and Antivirals We need a strategic stockpile of relevant vaccines and medicines. And beyond stockpiling, we should assess if we can manufacture these locally, possibly through partnerships with global pharma firms or by upgrading our biotech capabilities. 6. Build a Real-Time Reporting System Delays kill. A computerized system for real-time updates—from poultry farms to hospitals—can make a huge difference in containing an outbreak before it spreads. 7. Learn from the Past Let’s stop treating every outbreak like a brand-new surprise. The data exists—cases, recoveries, fatalities. Let’s analyze what happened in past Bird Flu outbreaks, including the recent fatality in Louisiana, USA. Trends matter. They tell us what to prepare for. 8. Work with Global Partners The Philippines doesn’t need to fight this alone. We can and should learn from other nations, tap the expertise of the World Health Organization (WHO), and join regional early-warning networks. Poultry is food, livelihood, and export. But it’s also a ticking time bomb if left unchecked in the face of Bird Flu. This is not just a poultry issue—it’s a public health concern, an economic risk, and a test of our preparedness. If we act now, we save lives and protect livelihoods. If we wait, we invite disaster. Bird Flu may not be trending yet—but in public health, the smart money is always on prevention, not reaction. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-16-2025

ENDING JOB MISMATCH WITH AI: TECH SOLUTION FOR A STUBBORN PROBLEM

ENDING JOB MISMATCH WITH AI: TECH SOLUTION FOR A STUBBORN PROBLEM Job mismatch is not just a technical issue—it’s a silent productivity killer and a threat to national well-being. Every year, thousands of qualified Filipinos are either underemployed or wrongly placed, resulting in a workforce that's not just underutilized, but demoralized. It’s time we accept this harsh truth: our current system of matching people to jobs is broken. But there's good news—artificial intelligence (AI) may be the breakthrough we’ve been waiting for. Let’s define the problem first. Job mismatch happens when a person’s skills, education, or experience don’t align with the demands of the job they land. This may seem harmless at first glance, but the consequences are far-reaching: · Job insecurity rises as mismatched workers are more likely to be laid off. · Employers lose money on hiring and training people who don’t stay long. · Some companies abuse the mismatch excuse to delay regularization and dodge employee benefits. · Mental health takes a hit, with job instability and lack of satisfaction leading to anxiety, burnout, and worse. · Social risks multiply, as unemployed or underemployed individuals may resort to crime or other risky behaviors just to survive. Despite these red flags, we've long tolerated this cycle—posting job ads, sorting résumés, interviewing mismatched applicants, and repeating the whole thing when it doesn’t work out. So here’s the proposal: Let AI handle the matchmaking. A Filipino-developed AI platform now exists that can precisely pair job seekers with employers, based not just on keywords but on a comprehensive set of data points—skills, experience, interests, location, and even aptitude. Think of it as a dating app for jobs, only smarter and more purposeful. Even better, this AI tool is not for sale. It’s offered as a free subscription, meaning the government can endorse and promote it without legal complications—no procurement, no bidding, no red tape. Job seekers benefit without spending a single peso. Employers get better candidates. Government agencies can refer applicants with confidence. This kind of tech-based approach could also help clean up one of the public sector’s open secrets: the overuse of job order (JO) and contract of service (COS) positions. Too often, agencies fill tech roles with warm bodies rather than well-matched talent. With AI-powered matching, we can make sure that digitalization efforts are supported by the right people with the right skills, not just whoever’s available. Let’s also remember that mismatch is not limited to unemployment. Underemployment—when someone is technically employed but working below their qualifications—is just as destructive. The Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) has found that 40% of working Filipinos are overqualified for their jobs. That’s not just wasted talent. That’s a systemic failure. Fixing this can lead to higher job satisfaction, lower turnover rates, and a more resilient economy. And while this AI solution was designed primarily with private sector hiring in mind, there’s no reason it can’t be adapted for government use, especially in conjunction with training programs like the Enterprise-Based Education and Training (EBET) Framework Act. This is a low-cost, high-impact solution. It won’t require huge capital outlays. It won’t need new laws. What it needs is political will and leadership endorsement. It’s about time we moved past the old, inefficient ways of job hunting—random résumés, guesswork hiring, and HR roulette—and embraced data-driven, AI-assisted employment matching. The technology is here. The software exists. The only question now is: Will we use it? Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-15-2025

LEGAL AID FOR FILIPINOS JAILED ABROAD: A DUTY BEYOND DIPLOMACY

LEGAL AID FOR FILIPINOS JAILED ABROAD: A DUTY BEYOND DIPLOMACY There are several Filipinos currently detained or jailed in foreign countries—some awaiting trial, others already convicted, and a few even facing the death penalty. While we take pride in being a nation of global workers, we must also ask ourselves: What happens when one of our own falls into legal trouble abroad? Who fights for them? Who pays for the lawyer? This is not just a consular matter—it is a test of our national conscience. As it stands, Filipino lawyers cannot practice in most foreign jurisdictions unless they undergo accreditation or benefit from very rare reciprocity agreements. This means that our overseas compatriots must rely on local legal representation in countries where the justice systems may be unfamiliar, intimidating, and sometimes even hostile. In past cases, especially those involving capital punishment, our government has stepped in only at the eleventh hour, scrambling to pay "blood money" or to file diplomatic appeals. These efforts, though well-intentioned, are often too little, too late. This raises several critical questions: Does the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) or the Department of Migrant Workers (DMW) have a sufficient budget to retain legal counsel for overseas Filipinos? Is there a long-term, structured plan to ensure timely and effective legal support—not just emergency response? We can’t continue to rely on reactive solutions. What we need is a proactive legal safety net, and here’s how it could work: 1. Establish a Legal Aid Fund Let’s allocate bigger budgets to hire local, licensed lawyers in countries where Filipinos are jailed. Early legal intervention can often mean the difference between acquittal and conviction—or even life and death. 2. Set Up a Specialized Legal Aid Unit A permanent inter-agency unit, led by DFA in coordination with the DMW and the Commission on Filipinos Overseas (CFO), should oversee legal aid coordination. This unit would vet local lawyers, monitor ongoing cases, and provide centralized support for embassies and consulates. 3. Forge Global Partnerships Legal aid is expensive. But we can tap into goodwill networks. Let’s partner with foreign bar associations, legal aid NGOs, and even Rotary Clubs and religious organizations in host countries. Many of these groups are willing to help, but they need structured engagement. 4. Negotiate Bilateral Agreements It’s time to push for mutual legal assistance treaties that would allow either the practice of Filipino lawyers abroad (under supervision) or allow local governments to help facilitate representation for foreign nationals. 5. Publicize the Value of Early Legal Action Our embassies should educate our OFWs and migrant families on the importance of early legal intervention. It is not just about getting a lawyer—it’s about getting the right one early enough in the process to make a real difference. 6. Consider Rehabilitation and Exchange For long-term detainees, especially those serving time for non-violent offenses, let’s explore prisoner exchanges or rehabilitation programs. Countries like the U.S., U.K., France, and Australia already do this for their own citizens abroad. Why not us? To be clear, this is not about shielding criminals. It’s about ensuring due process, fair trials, and equal treatment under the law—principles we uphold at home and should defend abroad. Besides, let’s not kid ourselves. The cost of legal aid, while not insignificant, is a small price to pay to protect the lives, dignity, and rights of Filipinos who might otherwise be voiceless in a foreign legal system. It’s often said that the strength of a government lies in how it treats its most vulnerable. There are few citizens more vulnerable than a Filipino behind bars in a foreign country, often alone, often afraid, and often without a clue on what to do next. The time has come to show that we are not just a labor-exporting country—we are a country that stands by its people, wherever they may be, especially when it matters most. Let’s bring legal aid into the spotlight. Not as an afterthought, not as a headline crisis, but as a permanent pillar of our foreign service commitment. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-14-2025

MODERNIZING TRAFFIC CONTROL: IT’S TIME TO LET ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVE

MODERNIZING TRAFFIC CONTROL: IT’S TIME TO LET ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVE Traffic congestion has become a daily curse for millions of Filipinos, especially in Metro Manila. It wastes time, drains productivity, and worsens pollution. Every administration promises to fix it, yet the solutions have largely remained piecemeal and reactive. But today, we are in a unique position to rethink traffic management entirely—by putting Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the driver's seat. With President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. championing modernization and infrastructure development, I believe now is the right time to pursue a technology-driven, data-informed, and interdisciplinary approach to solving our country’s traffic woes. Let me lay out some key ideas that I believe the government, especially the Department of Transportation (DOTr) and its partners, can consider: 1. Open the Traffic Conversation to More Minds Traffic is not just an engineering problem—it’s a behavioral, urban planning, and governance problem too. That’s why we need to broaden participation. Let’s invite more experts from urban design, psychology, data analytics, and environmental sciences into the discussion. 2. Bring in the Experts We have top-tier research talent right here in the Philippines. The National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) and Future Earth Philippines are two valuable knowledge partners. Likewise, the National Center for Transportation Studies (NCTS) at UP Diliman has long been at the forefront of transportation research and training. Why aren’t we tapping them more deeply? 3. Break Down Silos The DOTr and the MMDA must stop operating in silos. True progress requires institutional collaboration, especially with the Regional Development Councils (RDCs) of the surrounding provinces that form part of Mega Manila. Let’s not forget the private sector, particularly SMC Infrastructure and other toll road operators who should be in sync with the government’s traffic flow strategy. 4. Use the Full Power of Technology There is no excuse today for managing traffic blindly. We now have access to Google Earth, Waze, DICT data, and MMDA feeds, just to name a few. The Advanced Science and Technology Institute (ASTI) and the Philippine Space Agency (PhilSA) can help us leverage AI and machine learning to predict congestion, recommend reroutes, and optimize traffic signal timing. Even drones can be deployed for real-time traffic mapping. 5. Define What Success Looks Like We need clear, measurable targets—like average traffic speed in kilometers per hour. We also need to enforce emissions laws and safety standards to reduce road clutter. Repeat violators must be dealt with seriously—license suspensions should be on the table. 6. Make Public Transport Attractive We’ve made good steps with the bus carousel, but we can go further. Let’s promote ridesharing for commuters, expand the looping concept, and ensure train stations have parking spaces and integrated bus-jeepney routes for seamless transfers. 7. Smarter Infrastructure It’s not just about roads—it’s about smart roads. Upgrade CCTV cameras to read QR codes, RFID tags, and even license plates. Equip command centers with the tools to electronically bill traffic violators and track movement patterns. Let’s use facial recognition only where ethically appropriate and legally sound. 8. Count the Cost—and Act Accordingly Let’s compute the daily economic cost of traffic (some studies peg it at ₱3.5 billion per day in Metro Manila alone!)—and then justify investments in traffic tech and infrastructure accordingly. We lose more by delaying. 9. Start Traffic Education Early Why wait until people are licensed drivers? Include traffic education in the school curriculum, from grade school to high school. It’s about building a culture of discipline and awareness from the ground up. The traffic crisis is not just an inconvenience—it’s a national development issue. But it’s also an opportunity. If we do this right, we can show the world how a developing country with a tech-savvy population can leapfrog into a smarter, safer, and more sustainable transportation future. Let’s use AI not just to solve traffic—but to lead the future of mobility in Southeast Asia. The pieces are all in place. What we need now is vision, leadership, and coordination. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-13-2025

REVISITING THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 911 SYSTEM

REVISITING THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 911 SYSTEM It’s a good thing the Marcos administration is now trying to fix what has long been a broken yet vital public service: the National Emergency 911 System. While former President Rodrigo Duterte made the first serious attempt to unify and modernize our emergency hotline, technical issues and institutional resistance held it back. That said, it now appears the Marcos administration is finally addressing many of those lingering problems—though some challenges remain. I speak not only as a concerned citizen but as someone who has personally called 911 several times—not to prank or dramatize, but to test the system and understand how it truly functions. Let me share some observations. First, unlike in other countries, the first voice you hear when you call 911 in the Philippines is not a human, but a robot. Yes, a voice prompt that instructs you to press: · 1 for police assistance, · 2 for the fire department, · 3 for medical emergencies. Only after pressing a number will a live operator come on the line and ask the familiar, “What is your emergency?” In other countries, especially those with advanced emergency systems, the first to answer a call is always a human being—trained to be calm, to assess the situation, and to immediately act on the call. Robots may have their place of course, but in a life-or-death situation, human judgment must come first. Interestingly, after speaking with a few 911 operators, I discovered that regardless of which number you press, the call eventually goes back to the same group of live operators. That’s because these people are not actual dispatchers, but merely telephone operators who relay your call to the nearest police, fire, or ambulance provider. This might sound like a small technicality, but it’s a critical flaw. Around the world, standard 911 protocol dictates that the first responder on the call also serves as the dispatcher, managing the case from beginning to end. That’s how you ensure continuity, accountability, and faster decision-making. Unfortunately, our current system breaks that chain. This isn’t my first time evaluating 911. I’ve seen first-hand how difficult it has been to integrate legacy numbers like 117 into the unified system. Despite Executive Order No. 56 signed by President Duterte in 2018—officially designating 911 as the national emergency number—some agencies simply refused to integrate. Why? Turf wars, internal resistance, and a lack of political will. That’s why I was relieved to hear the newly appointed PNP Chief, General Nicolas Torre III, say that 117 will remain as an internal system, while full support will be given to 911 as the national emergency number. This long-overdue alignment could finally pave the way for a truly unified system. I also commend DILG Secretary Jonvic Remulla, who appears to be taking a hands-on approach to this project. One major improvement under his watch is that 911 can now be called from any mobile phone without entering a local area code—a basic but crucial functionality. Even more impressive, all 911 calls are now free of charge, a rare policy considering that many countries bill callers through their telecom providers. This is a bold move, and I salute Remulla and Torre for making it happen. But even with all these gains, the biggest unresolved issue remains: ambulance dispatch. Unfortunately, neither Secretary Remulla nor General Torre has jurisdiction over this. Most ambulances are controlled locally—by city mayors, local disaster risk offices, or public hospitals. And that creates a fragmented, inconsistent response system. To make matters worse, many ambulances lack trained Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) or licensed paramedics. They’re simply vehicles, not fully equipped mobile ERs. And even when private ambulances are called in, somebody must pay. Government ambulances are free, but private units may charge ₱5,000 to ₱12,000 or even more depending on the distance. In an emergency, the last thing a family should worry about is money. That’s why I sincerely hope Secretary Remulla or General Torre could help craft a policy or subsidy that would make all ambulances—public or private—free at the point of need. As the Unified 911 Emergency System rolls out across Metro Manila, BARMM, Ilocos Region, and Central Visayas, there’s reason to be hopeful. The plan includes real-time video streaming, geolocation tracking, and even automatic dispatch of the nearest responders. The goal? A five-minute response time—a true game-changer if implemented correctly. They are also tackling the plague of prank calls with smart filtering systems and legal consequences for offenders. Repeat prank callers will be tagged, tracked, and potentially prosecuted. These are bold, tech-forward solutions. But at the heart of it all, the system must be human-centric. Robots and software can help, but they should never replace the first human contact that can save a life. The potential is all here. The tools are being built. The question now is: Will we follow through? Let’s not wait for another crisis to find out. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-12-2025

TOWARDS AN UNDERGROUND REVOLUTION IN FOOD

TOWARDS AN UNDERGROUND REVOLUTION IN FOOD All of you have probably heard of the Green Revolution, the historical wave of agricultural innovations that dramatically increased global food production through high-yield crops and modern farming techniques. But today, I want to introduce you to something different—something closer to home and closer to the ground, quite literally. Let’s talk about the Underground Revolution, as it applies to food. Now, let me be honest right away: there is no official “Underground Revolution” out there, not in the textbooks or policy documents. It's an idea of my own making—my personal figment of imagination. But that doesn’t mean it can’t be real, or that it can’t make a difference. What do I mean by underground? I’m talking about edible root crops—those humble, nutritious, and often overlooked alternatives that grow underground: sweet potatoes, cassavas, potatoes, taros, yams, ube, yacon, and many others. These are the foods that, while not meant to replace rice, can certainly supplement it, especially as rice becomes more expensive to produce and, therefore, more expensive to buy. We Filipinos love our rice—it’s the centerpiece of almost every meal. But supplementing it with other staples makes practical and economic sense. After all, our agricultural lands and farmers are under increasing pressure. So why not ease some of that burden by tapping into crops that thrive in varied conditions and are rich in nutrients? Some of these root crops can also be milled into flour, opening the possibility of baking bread as a staple that, again, supplements—not replaces—rice. This is not an either-or scenario. It’s about expanding our options. Just think about how years ago, when McDonald’s first opened in the Philippines, many predicted failures. “Filipinos will never eat a meal without rice,” they said. But guess what? We lined up for hamburgers anyway. And in a delicious twist of cultural adaptation, the Philippines became the first country in the world where McDonald’s served rice. Now imagine what we can do with bread, made not from imported wheat, but from locally grown root crops. Let’s talk briefly about yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius), for instance—a root crop native to the Andes but increasingly grown here. It’s sweet, crunchy, and can be eaten raw. Or sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) and potatoes (Solanum tuberosum)—despite their similar names, these are different plants that both offer rich potential. Why not make flour from these crops? Here’s a simple truth: homemade flour is easier to make than you might think. You just need to clean and dry your chosen base crop, grind it with a blender or mill, sift if desired, and store it properly. That’s it. Flour from cassava, taro, or yam is entirely doable, even at the household level. What about baking? No need for fancy ovens. Instead of buying costly indoor electric ovens, communities can build outdoor ovens from bricks, clay, or even hollow blocks. These can be fueled using charcoal briquettes made from agricultural waste, readily available in rural areas. That makes the process both affordable and sustainable. In this imagined Underground Revolution, every barangay could have access to flour-making tools and brick ovens. Every community could bake bread using crops grown in their own soil. Every household could feel less pressure to depend on increasingly expensive rice or imported wheat. So, will this Underground Revolution take root? That’s up to all of us. But one thing is clear: it’s time we look beneath the ground for answers to our food security. The solutions might just be growing right under our feet. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-11-2025

DON’T FORGET THE NATIONAL PLASTIC ACTION PARTNERSHIP

DON’T FORGET THE NATIONAL PLASTIC ACTION PARTNERSHIP As the winds of change sweep through the halls of government, with newly appointed cabinet secretaries stepping in and others stepping down, there is always a danger that programs and policies—no matter how well-intentioned or well-crafted—might be left behind. Priorities shift, directions change, and sometimes, progress is quietly undone not by intention, but by omission. That is why I’m sounding this appeal—raising my voice to urge our newly appointed Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Rafael Lotilla, to make sure that one critically important initiative does not fall by the wayside: the National Plastic Action Partnership (NPAP). The NPAP is not just another acronym. It’s a crucial national initiative, spearheaded by the DENR, that seeks to reverse the tide of plastic pollution in the Philippines. Through this partnership, government, industry, civil society, and development partners work together to drive the country toward a circular economy—where waste is minimized, and resources are kept in use for as long as possible. At the heart of this push is the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Act of 2022. This landmark law holds producers accountable for the plastic waste they generate. It sets ambitious but necessary targets: a 20% plastic recovery and diversion rate by 2023, and 40% by 2024. These aren’t just numbers—they’re lifelines in our battle against pollution. I don’t know about you, but I’ve always had the sense that plastic pollution didn’t receive the urgent and sustained attention it deserved under former DENR Secretary Maria Antonia Yulo-Loyzaga. And while many environmental issues compete for our focus, this one is quite literally in the air we breathe. Microplastic pollution is no longer an abstract concern; it is a growing health and environmental crisis. Studies have detected microplastics in everything from marine life to market-bought mussels, from road dust to the very air of Metro Manila. These particles can carry dangerous bacteria, viruses, and toxins. In other words, what we’re breathing, eating, and drinking may already be compromised. Worse, the Philippines is drowning in plastic. We produce 2.3 to 2.7 million metric tons of plastic waste each year, and only 28% is recycled. The rest clogs our waterways, chokes our seas, and breaks down into the microplastics now infiltrating our environment and bodies. It’s no surprise that we are considered one of the top contributors to marine plastic pollution globally. This is why we cannot afford to lose momentum. The NPAP is one of the few well-structured, multi-sectoral efforts that can help us break free from the harmful "take-make-waste" model and shift toward sustainability. But like any partnership, it needs champions—leaders who will see it through, even amid transitions in power. So, Secretary Lotilla, the ball is in your court. I hope you will recognize the gravity of this issue and lead with the urgency it demands. Uphold our commitments to the NPAP. Enforce the EPR Act. Engage with communities, industries, and scientists. And above all, don’t forget that the fight against plastic pollution isn’t just about waste—it’s about protecting public health, preserving biodiversity, and securing a livable future for all Filipinos. The work has already begun. Now, it’s up to you to ensure it continues. Would you like to know more about how you can contribute to the solution? Let’s keep this conversation going. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-10-2025

SEPARATING THE DISASTER RISK REDUCTION FUNCTION FROM THE DISASTER RESPONSE FUNCTION

SEPARATING THE DISASTER RISK REDUCTION FUNCTION FROM THE DISASTER RESPONSE FUNCTION If there’s one thing that recent disasters in the Philippines have made clear, it’s this: while we have made progress in our disaster-related ecosystem, there is still room for reform. And perhaps it’s time we take a hard look at the very structure of how we deal with disasters—specifically, how we combine disaster risk reduction (DRR) and disaster response under a single agency, the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC). As it stands today, both DRR and response functions are bundled under the NDRRMC, a body established by Republic Act 10121 to spearhead disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. While this framework has brought coordination, it may also be causing confusion—because disaster prevention and disaster response are not the same. Frankly, I’ve always been uncomfortable with the term “disaster management”. How exactly do you manage a disaster? Disasters are not meetings to organize or systems to streamline—they are crises that upend lives, destroy communities, and challenge institutions. What we can manage are our responses to disasters. What we should reduce are the risks that lead to disasters. These are two separate tasks—requiring different mindsets, tools, and areas of expertise. The Case for Separation Here’s a thought: What if we place disaster risk reduction and mitigation under the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), and shift disaster response and recovery to the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG)? You may not see it the way I do, but risk reduction—especially when it comes to landslides, floods, droughts, and oil spills—is an environmental function. These are areas where prevention and mitigation are critical, and that’s where agencies like the DENR, PAGASA, PHIVOLCS, and the DOST come in. In fact, the DOST already spearheads projects like Dynaslope, GeoRiskPH, and Project SARAI—all of which are focused on anticipating hazards and minimizing their impact. So why not formally place DRR under the DENR? Even manmade disasters, such as oil spills or toxic chemical leaks, fall squarely within the environmental realm. DENR already regulates and monitors industries that pose such risks. Now let’s talk about disaster response. When floods hit or earthquakes strike, who responds first? It’s the local PNP, the Bureau of Fire Protection, and the local government units (LGUs). These are agencies under the DILG. Even when national mobilization is needed, it’s the DILG Secretary who can more quickly call upon mayors and governors than, say, the Department of National Defense (DND). Civilian Leadership in Disaster Response Why the DILG and not the DND? Globally, there’s a clear shift toward civilian-led disaster response, leaving the military to support rather than lead. In our case, while the Office of Civil Defense (OCD) under the DND plays a crucial coordinating role, the actual boots on the ground are mostly civilian. The DND should support, not spearhead, response efforts. This doesn’t mean removing the DND from the picture entirely. On the contrary, the OCD, though attached to the DND, can still function as a coordinating body, especially when military assets are needed. But overall operational control should lie with the DILG, whose mandate and structure are better suited for rapid deployment and coordination at the local level. Drawing the Line So, where do we draw the line? At the risk of oversimplifying, the DENR should be responsible for preventing disasters or minimizing their environmental impact, while the DILG should manage the actual response when a disaster occurs. This division would bring clarity, accountability, and efficiency. Of course, we must still retain the NDRRMC, at least until RA 10121 is amended. The NDRRMC remains essential as a policy and coordination body that ensures both sides—the preventive and the reactive—are talking to each other. Toward a Better System In truth, this is not about breaking things apart for the sake of it. It’s about refining our system so that each agency can focus on its core strengths. After all, resilience is built not just on good responses, but on good preparation—and that preparation must come from the sectors that know the risks best. And in the final analysis, this is about balancing efficiency with empathy. We must move away from frameworks that enrich a few and toward systems that empower communities. Because in disasters, it’s the people—not the paperwork—that matter most. Maybe it’s time we rethink our structure. Maybe it's time to separate disaster risk reduction from disaster response—and bring clarity to chaos before the next big one hits. Let’s not wait for another disaster to force us into action. Let’s start thinking about this now. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-09-2025

EXTENDED BUS CAROUSEL DESIGN CONCEPT

EXTENDED BUS CAROUSEL DESIGN CONCEPT I simply cannot understand why anyone would want to put a stop to the EDSA Bus Carousel Project. It is an excellent idea, and more importantly, it is working very well. Who exactly is so affected by the project that they want it discontinued? Could it be the private bus companies? That seems unlikely, given that they are all welcome to join the system if they so choose. Or perhaps it is those who are not earning as much as they did before because the era of cutthroat competition is over? To be fair, that competition may be gone, but no one can deny that the flow of traffic on EDSA has improved. Yes, the traffic is still slow but imagine how much worse it would be if the Bus Carousel Project is removed. Personally, I support the EDSA Bus Carousel Project so much that I would like to see it extended farther—both to the north and south—as far as it could possibly go. Is it not obvious to everyone that the Carousel Project is essentially a bus-train concept? A bus-train system is essentially a train without the railway tracks, and more importantly, it is a far cheaper alternative. In many other countries, this concept is called a "Bus Rapid Transit" (BRT) system. If you ask me, we could even call it "Bus Extended Rapid Train" (BERT). Going further, the entire system could be managed like a single train company, complete with a unified scheduling and fare collection system. Not to overcomplicate things, but BERT represents the practical implementation of a mass transit strategy. A well-designed mass transit strategy encourages people to take public transport instead of driving cars or taking taxis. The more people use BERT, the fewer private vehicles we will have on the road, improving traffic flow even further. I once lived in New York and never had to drive a car to work because the train system was so reliable. Parking was expensive and hard to find, so the choice was easy. If we develop the EDSA Bus Carousel system into a full BERT model, we can give Metro Manila commuters that same choice. Eventually, the BERT should be fully integrated with MRT, LRT, and even PNR. A single fare collection system—like Hong Kong’s Octopus system—should be introduced for convenience. As the saying goes, "If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it." But to that, I would add: "If I can make it better, why not?" Examples of Extended Urban Bus-Train Projects: Articulated Bus Systems Curitiba, Brazil: Curitiba’s BRT system features articulated buses that can carry up to 270 passengers. Vancouver, Canada: TransLink’s articulated buses provide high-capacity service on busy urban routes. Bi-Articulated Bus Systems Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The city’s BRT system includes bi-articulated buses capable of transporting up to 350 passengers. Bogotá, Colombia: The TransMilenio system operates bi-articulated buses to handle large passenger volumes efficiently. Tram-Style Bus Systems Adelaide, Australia: The O-Bahn Busway features tram-style buses for efficient urban transit. Essen, Germany: The Essen Stadtbahn combines tram-style buses with urban rail systems. Other Successful Urban Transit Models Singapore’s Bus Plus: A high-capacity system featuring articulated buses and dedicated bus lanes. London’s New Routemaster: A hybrid bus design offering extended layouts and increased passenger capacity. Successful BRT Projects Demonstrating Extended Urban Coverage TransMilenio (Bogotá, Colombia): One of the world’s most successful BRT systems, with dedicated lanes and efficient fare collection. Guangzhou BRT (China): A high-capacity system serving densely populated urban areas. Curitiba Red Line (Brazil): A pioneering BRT model integrated with land-use planning. Metrobus (Istanbul, Turkey): Connecting the European and Asian sides of the city through a BRT network. Ecovia (Porto Alegre, Brazil): A well-integrated system within the city’s transit plan. Key Features of Extended Urban BRT Projects Dedicated Bus Lanes: Ensuring speed and reliability. Enclosed Stations: Pre-board fare collection improves efficiency. High-Capacity Buses: Articulated or bi-articulated buses handle large passenger volumes. Integrated Ticketing: Seamless connectivity with other transit modes. Traffic Signal Priority: Reducing travel times at intersections. A strong, well-extended BERT system is not just about improving transit. It is about reshaping cities to become more livable and efficient. The EDSA Bus Carousel has already taken the first step—now let’s take it further. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-08-2025

DECLARING TOTAL WAR AGAINST THE JANITOR FISH

DECLARING TOTAL WAR AGAINST THE JANITOR FISH Yes, the janitor fish is a catfish, but it is not our catfish. Native to South America, this species was never meant to be part of our lakes and rivers. It was only intended to be a pet fish, valued by aquarium owners for its ability to clean fish tanks of waste and algae, thus earning its name, “janitor fish.” However, the fish has now established itself in Philippine waters, wreaking havoc on our ecosystems. How did it get here? Some say floods released them into the wild, while others blame irresponsible owners who discarded them into our lakes and rivers. Regardless of how it happened, the janitor fish is now an invasive species, rapidly multiplying and endangering native aquatic life. A Culinary Misfit and Ecological Threat Unlike our beloved native catfish, janitor fish are not suitable for human consumption. Reports suggest that although it may technically be edible, it tastes bad and has little culinary value. Instead, it is often considered more viable as animal feed. Additionally, some studies have explored the possibility of converting janitor fish into biodiesel fuel, providing an alternative use for this ecological menace. The Devastating Impact This invasive species poses a serious threat to our biodiversity. Janitor fish are known to feed on the eggs of native fish species and even prey on fingerlings, reducing the populations of commercially and ecologically important species. Their presence has already been documented in critical freshwater bodies, including the Agusan Marsh and the Liguasan Marsh. Fortunately, Lake Lanao has not yet fallen victim to this invasion, and we must ensure it stays that way. Laguna Lake, the largest in the country, is a glaring example of the janitor fish’s destructive impact. If the government can successfully eradicate the species from Laguna Lake, it will serve as a hopeful model for addressing infestations elsewhere. A Call to Action The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) must lead the charge in this battle. However, this challenge is too large for any one agency to tackle alone. The Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA), the Philippine Coast Guard, and even local communities must work together. To achieve success, we must: 1. Set a Clear Target: The government should declare a deadline for eliminating janitor fish from our lakes and rivers. Five years could be a reasonable goal. 2. Expand Research and Development: We have already seen the potential for janitor fish to be converted into biodiesel. Investing in this technology can turn an ecological disaster into an economic opportunity. 3. Promote Community Involvement: Local fishers should be incentivized to catch and remove janitor fish, while awareness campaigns can educate the public on the dangers of invasive species. 4. Strengthen Monitoring and Regulation: Preventing further spread is critical. Stricter regulations should be implemented to prevent the release of exotic species into natural waterways. Food Security and Ecological Balance This issue goes beyond ecological preservation — it is also a matter of food security. The more janitor fish consume native fish eggs and fingerlings, the fewer edible fish we have for consumption. Left unchecked, this invasive species could contribute to a significant decline in our local fish supply. We cannot allow this silent invasion to continue. The government must act decisively, with agencies like BFAR, DENR, and LLDA working in coordination. Let Laguna Lake be the battleground where we prove that invasive species can be defeated. Declaring total war against the janitor fish is not just an environmental obligation — it is a necessary step to protect our nation’s food security and biodiversity. Victory may not come easy, but with unity and determination, we can reclaim our lakes and rivers from this unwelcome invader. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-07-2025

USING ITHE INTERNET FOR EASE OF DOING BUSINESS

USING THE INTERNET FOR EASE OF DOING BUSINESS It wasn't too long ago when doing business in the Philippines meant first getting a landline phone installed. Without one, you were essentially out of the loop — unconnected and uncompetitive. And it didn’t stop there. Most businesses also needed a fax machine, sometimes even a second landline just to receive documents. Making a long-distance call? You had to physically go to a calling station. Video calls were science fiction. I remember my father rushing to the downtown telegram office multiple times a day to send messages to Manila — all in the name of business. Face-to-face meetings meant boarding a plane or driving for hours. Today, we do it all online, sometimes even while wearing house slippers. Now, the internet has replaced our landlines and fax machines. It’s the modern nervous system of our economy. That’s the good news. The bad news? Our internet is still slow, unsafe, and expensive. Let’s talk about why. It's not that we lack connections. The problem lies in routing. When we send data from Manila to Los Angeles, for example, it often takes the equivalent of a scenic tour — through Guam, Hawaii, Tokyo, and beyond — before reaching its destination. It’s like booking a flight from Manila to L.A. via Hong Kong, Tokyo, Honolulu, Anchorage, and Seattle — exhausting and inefficient. This long routing path makes our internet slower and more vulnerable. The more stops, the more chances of data being intercepted or delayed. That’s a serious risk in a digital age where data privacy and cybersecurity are paramount. Now, here’s the hopeful part: this is not a hopeless problem. In fact, it’s a solvable one. Can we make the internet faster, safer, and cheaper? Yes. And even better. Better means more availability — even in rural areas. Better means more features — like secure payment systems, cloud access, and remote working tools for micro, small, and medium enterprises. Better means ease of doing business — not just in Manila, but in Marawi, Mindoro, and Maguindanao too. I won’t presume to tell our internet providers what to do — they surely know their own systems better than anyone. Nor will I dictate to government agencies how to act — because surely, they know what’s at stake. But I do believe that in a free market, what cannot be enforced through regulation might be encouraged through diplomacy. A little pressure here, a bit of collaboration there — it’s a balancing act between corporate interests and the public good. Let’s look at the facts. The Philippines ranks 5th in broadband speed and 6th in mobile speed in ASEAN, behind Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia. Our fixed broadband averages 94.1 Mbps, compared to Singapore’s blazing 336.45 Mbps. In mobile speed, we lag again — at 33.7 Mbps, while Malaysia clocks 107 Mbps. And it’s not just speed. In terms of cost, we pay more than countries like Thailand and Vietnam — who also happen to offer faster and more reliable services. The average monthly broadband cost in the Philippines is $28.21, compared to Thailand’s $16.24 or Vietnam’s $9.44. Why is this important? Because in today’s digital economy, internet access equals access to opportunity. A slow, unstable connection is not just an inconvenience — it's a barrier to growth. More than that, it’s about economic empathy. We must stop enriching only those who control the cables and the towers and start thinking about the everyday Filipino entrepreneur trying to file a permit online, attend a virtual seminar, or close a deal with a foreign buyer. The bottom line: This is not just about tech. It’s about fairness. It's about giving people — especially small business owners — the tools to succeed. It's about using the internet to truly make business easier, not harder. Let’s fix the routes, fix the speed, and fix the cost. Not just for the sake of catching up, but for the sake of moving forward. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-06-2025

RETHINKING OUR RICE CONSUMPTION

RETHINKING OUR RICE CONSUMPTION Whoever invented the marketing gimmick of “unlimited rice” must be out of his mind. It might have sounded like a good business tactic to attract customers, but when you examine the ecological and agricultural cost of producing rice, it becomes clear how unsustainable that offer really is. Did you know that it takes anywhere between 2,500 to 5,000 liters of fresh water to produce just one kilo of rice, depending on the method and the climate? That’s not even counting the additional water we use to wash and cook the rice. At this rate, if we don’t change course, we will either run out of land to plant rice or run out of the fresh water needed to irrigate it. And if you’re thinking we can just import more rice when our supply runs low, think again. Climate change, natural disasters, and growing populations may eventually force rice-exporting countries to hold on to their own supplies, regardless of how much money we wave at them. So again, why advocate for unlimited rice? Let’s consider the current trends: more and more arable land is being converted into subdivisions, highways, and shopping malls. Meanwhile, our fresh water supply is dwindling — aquifers are drying up or getting contaminated, and in many coastal areas, rising sea levels are turning our water sources salty. Sure, desalination might come to mind as a solution, but that process is energy-intensive and would only drive up the cost of rice production even further. As of 2024, the average Filipino consumes 151.3 kilograms of rice per year — a figure that reflects our heavy reliance on rice as a staple. However, according to Dr. Theodore Mendoza, an agronomist from UP Los Baños, we need to cut that figure nearly in half, down to 80 kilograms per year, to make our consumption sustainable. Dr. Roel Suralta, another expert from UP Los Baños and PhilRice, agrees with this assessment. He recommends diversifying our diets to include other carbohydrate sources such as corn, potatoes, cassava, and sweet potatoes. At a recent forum sponsored by Future Earth Philippines, Dr. Mendoza, Dr. Suralta, and I found common ground in the belief that food diversification is essential for food security. Even the venerable Dr. Ruben Villareal, also from UP Los Baños and now 86 years old, testified during the same forum that he has long embraced a varied diet and is all the healthier for it. From Mindanao to Camotes Island, examples abound. Some Indigenous Tribal Peoples (ITPs) have long relied on cassava, bananas, and sweet potatoes during hard times. In Camotes Island, where Dr. Suralta hails from, people eat more corn and root crops, and according to him, they are generally healthy and thriving. This isn’t a new idea. Even European explorers marooned in the South Pacific managed to survive by eating taro (gabi). The body can adapt — what’s harder to change is our culture. As Mr. Mark Rondel, another UP Los Baños scientist who moderated our forum, pointed out: our deep-rooted emotional attachment to rice makes dietary change a real challenge. Let’s not forget that rice is a political issue. A rice shortage could spark public unrest or even a political crisis. Which is why it’s imperative that we act now — before we’re left with no options. The bottom line: we need to reduce our rice consumption and embrace a more diversified food culture. Doing so is not only good for our health and environment but is also a step toward safeguarding our nation’s food security. Unlimited rice may be tempting today, but if we don’t rethink this mindset, tomorrow’s plate might be empty. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-05-2025

STOPPING THE RED-STRIPED SOFT SCALE INSECT

STOPPING THE RED-STRIPED SOFT SCALE INSECT The Red-Striped Soft Scale Insect (RSSI) infestation has become a creeping agricultural disaster, yet it appears that only one agency—the Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA)—is bearing the burden of this fight. That begs the question: why is this pest problem being treated as if it were a singular issue when it is clearly a national agricultural crisis? The RSSI, a destructive pest that has already ravaged over 400 hectares of sugarcane plantations, is threatening not only the economy of Negros Island—the heartland of Philippine sugar—but also the country’s overall sugar production and exports. It damages plants by sucking the sap from sugarcane leaves, leaving behind a sticky substance that encourages fungal growth, further degrading the crop. But this is not just the SRA’s problem. Is it not true that the SRA is under the Department of Agriculture (DA)? If so, why isn’t the DA taking the lead in this crisis—not just supporting, but actively mobilizing a multi-agency response? The scale of the infestation already hints at disaster-level proportions. And if that is the case, shouldn’t the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) already be involved? Negros Island alone produces more than 60% of the country's sugar. Its agriculture is the backbone of local economies and employment. Yet local government units (LGUs) in the region have been mostly quiet. Where are the provincial and municipal leaders in this fight? Why hasn’t the problem been escalated to the Regional Development Council (RDC) of the new Negros Island Region (NIR)? This is not just a farming issue—it’s an economic, social, and environmental concern that requires a coordinated regional response. Furthermore, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) should already be on the ground assessing how this infestation could disrupt sugar exports. How will this affect manufacturers of food and beverage products that rely on sugar? What ripple effects will it cause in consumer prices and supply chains? At this point, the SRA must ask for the help of the Department of Science and Technology (DOST). The agency could bring research, innovation, and technical support to develop smarter and more sustainable pest control methods—perhaps even beyond drone spraying and chemical interventions. Has this issue even reached the attention of the Cabinet? It should. Sugar is not just another crop; it’s an economic pillar, a major export, and an essential input to various food industries. If the damage spreads unchecked, we could be facing a nationwide supply shortfall and inflation in sugar-related goods. Finally, since RSSI has also affected other countries in Asia and beyond, why aren’t we seeking international technical assistance or best practices from those who’ve dealt with similar infestations? We’re not alone in this battle—let’s not act as if we are. The time to act is now. Waiting for this to escalate into a full-blown agricultural emergency will cost us more—not just in pesos, but in livelihoods and national food security. The fight against RSSI must be elevated to a whole-of-government effort before it becomes too late. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-04-2025

WHY IS HIV INFECTION AN ISSUE NOW?

WHY IS HIV INFECTION AN ISSUE NOW? Just when we thought it had faded into the background of public health concerns, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is once again making headlines in the Philippines. After years of declining or manageable numbers, why is HIV now being treated as a potential public health emergency? It wasn’t too long ago that the Department of Health (DOH) assured us that HIV cases in the country had dropped to levels they could handle. In fact, it seemed the disease had taken a back seat to more pressing issues like COVID-19 and mental health. But recent data paints a very different picture—one that is alarming enough for Health Secretary Ted Herbosa to recommend that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. declare a national public health emergency. The numbers are staggering. DOH Assistant Secretary Albert Francis E. Domingo reports that the country is now seeing an average of 57 new HIV cases every single day. The total number of HIV-positive individuals has reached nearly 100,000. And projections suggest that if nothing changes, this number could quadruple to 400,000 by the year 2030. This sudden surge demands answers. What’s fueling the rise in infections? Experts suggest that part of the answer lies in the changing social landscape. The widespread use of social media and dating apps has made it easier for young people to meet sexual partners, sometimes without fully understanding the risks involved. Combine that with the lack of comprehensive sex education and the stigma still surrounding HIV testing and diagnosis, and we have a recipe for an epidemic quietly growing under the radar. So, what can the Department of Health do beyond issuing alarming statistics? A good starting point would be to revive and strengthen its educational campaigns, particularly among the youth. One tool already in its arsenal is the ABCDE strategy—a proven and straightforward framework for HIV prevention: · A – Abstinence · B – Be mutually faithful · C – Consistent and correct use of condoms · D – Don’t use drugs or share needles · E – Education and early diagnosis This approach needs to be promoted aggressively and consistently—not just once a year during awareness campaigns, but embedded into schools, communities, and online platforms. But beyond government action, we need to talk about values and relationships. The reality is that no public health strategy can work in isolation from the social and moral environment in which people live. As a more sustainable solution, perhaps it is time for many young people to rediscover their own faith traditions and reconnect with their families and faith communities. These are the institutions that can provide the emotional grounding and moral compass often missing in an age of hyper-connectivity and casual encounters. To anyone who feels lost or unsure of how to return to their spiritual roots—I can help. I firmly believe that faith and family remain powerful forces of guidance and protection in navigating life’s more complex challenges, including those around sexuality and health. The numbers are sobering, but not irreversible. We need a national awakening—not just in policy, but in values and awareness. HIV is back in the headlines, yes—but whether it becomes a crisis or a turning point is up to us. Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-03-2025

RECALIBRATING THE DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM GOALS

RECALIBRATING THE DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM GOALS When President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. recently called for “faster, better, fiercer” governance in his recalibration of the Cabinet, the message was clear: no more business as usual. But what does this recalibration mean specifically for the Department of Tourism (DOT)? For Secretary Ma. Esperanza Christina Garcia Frasco, it’s a challenge to act with greater urgency, ambition, and strategic thinking. And for the tourism sector, which remains in recovery mode, it's a chance—perhaps the last—to catch up. The DOT, under Secretary Frasco, has set a target of 8.4 million international tourist arrivals for 2025. That sounds ambitious, but compared to our ASEAN neighbors, it's quite modest. Malaysia recorded 38 million arrivals in 2024. Thailand welcomed 35.54 million. Even Vietnam brought in 17.5 million, and Singapore, a city-state, saw 15.3 million. The Philippines? Just 5.95 million in 2024—well below the 7.7 million targets. Projections for 2025 suggest we may only reach 6 million, falling short once again. Is this what “fierce” looks like? Or is it time to truly recalibrate? One problem lies in the numbers themselves. It’s highly likely that a significant portion of our so-called international tourists are Filipino citizens or former citizens returning home for family visits. While their arrivals add to airport traffic, they cannot be credited to the DOT’s marketing or promotional efforts. They would have come home anyway, with or without tourism campaigns. It's about time the DOT distinguishes net tourist arrivals—excluding returning Filipinos—to better measure the real impact of tourism strategies. This isn't nitpicking; it’s about accountability. If we’re to be serious about competing with our ASEAN peers, we need a clearer picture of who’s coming to the Philippines as a tourist and why. A deeper look at the numbers reveals troubling trends. South Korean arrivals—the country’s top source of foreign tourists—dropped by 18%, largely due to rising crimes targeting Korean nationals. Chinese tourist arrivals also declined by 34.4%, affected by geopolitical tensions, economic slowdown, and cumbersome visa processes. These are red flags. A fierce response would mean urgent reforms in safety, policy, and perception. Meanwhile, other countries are not waiting. Japan saw over 10 million tourists in Q1 2025 alone. Malaysia is planning for 45 million arrivals in 2025 as part of its "Visit Malaysia 2026" campaign. They are expanding air routes, launching targeted campaigns, and making it easier—and safer—for tourists to visit. To catch up, the Philippines must start thinking—and acting—on a double-digit scale. Can Secretary Frasco revise the 2025 goal to at least 10 million arrivals? That would at least symbolically place us in the same bracket as our neighbors. But more importantly, we need to back those numbers with aggressive strategies: visa liberalization, targeted promotions in high-potential markets like India and Europe, improved airport infrastructure, and a nationwide culture of hospitality and safety. The President has laid down the challenge. The clock is ticking. Will the DOT answer the call with bold recalibration—or will we once again settle for just catching up? Ramon Ike V. Seneres, www.facebook.com/ike.seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 07-02-2025