TEN PERCENT CHARITY BEDS IN PRIVATE HOSPITALS

TEN PERCENT CHARITY BEDS IN PRIVATE HOSPITALS His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Subject: Inquiry on the Status of Implementation of DOH Administrative Order No. 2007-0041 Your Excellency, I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to inquire about the status of the implementation of the Department of Health (DOH) Administrative Order No. 2007-0041, which mandates private hospitals in the Philippines to allocate at least 10% of their bed capacity as charity beds for indigent patients. This critical provision aims to ensure that Filipinos who cannot afford medical services still have access to necessary healthcare. Specifically, I seek clarification and updates on the following aspects: 1. Implementation Status o How is this administrative order currently being implemented across the country? o What mechanisms are in place to ensure private hospitals adhere to this mandate? 2. Compliance Rate o What percentage of private hospitals in the Philippines are compliant with the 10% charity bed allocation requirement? o Are there regions where compliance is particularly high or low? 3. Incentives for Compliance o Are private hospitals that comply with this mandate provided with tax exemptions, tax credits, or any other form of incentives to encourage adherence? o If such incentives exist, how accessible and effective are they in promoting compliance? 4. Outstanding Examples o Are there private hospitals that serve as outstanding examples of compliance with the order? o Could you provide some specific cases of hospitals excelling in this regard? 5. Awards or Rewards System o Is there a system in place to recognize and reward private hospitals that consistently comply with or exceed the requirements of this administrative order? 6. Monitoring and Enforcement o Which government body or agency is primarily responsible for monitoring compliance with this order? o How are non-compliant hospitals addressed, and are there penalties for failure to meet the mandated charity bed requirement? The healthcare needs of indigent Filipinos remain a pressing concern, and the implementation of this administrative order is a vital step toward equitable access to healthcare. Transparency and updates on its progress will not only assure the public of the government’s commitment but also encourage private hospitals to actively contribute to this cause. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and any insights that you or the relevant agencies may provide regarding this important healthcare policy. To give credit where credit is due, the said order was signed by former DOH Secretary Francisco T. Duque during the term of former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. Since the order is for the benefit of poor Filipinos and it supports universal health care, I hope that with your support and guidance, incumbent DOH Secretary Teodoro J. Herbosa will revisit its implementation. I am also willing to help if databases and social media sites are needed for the purpose. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com Cc: Secretary, Department of Health President, Philippine Health Insurance Corporation 01-15-2025

Clarification on Tax Credit Policies for Donations to the Philippine National Police

Clarification on Tax Credit Policies for Donations to the Philippine National Police His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Your Excellency, I am writing to seek clarification and guidance on the tax credit policies applicable to individuals and entities donating to the Philippine National Police (PNP). This inquiry aims to encourage greater public participation in supporting the PNP’s essential programs by understanding the legal and tax framework surrounding such contributions. Specifically, I would like to request clarification on the following points: 1. Tax Credit Provisions for Donors Could you kindly identify the specific laws or executive issuances governing the granting of tax credits to donors of money, equipment, or other resources to the PNP? Understanding the legal basis will enable potential donors to comply with all requirements and maximize their contributions. 2. Type of Equipment Allowed Are there specific guidelines or limitations on the types of equipment that can be donated to the PNP? For example, does this include communication devices, surveillance tools, vehicles, or other operational necessities? 3. Inclusion of Services Can donations in the form of services (e.g., maintenance, training, or consultancy) qualify for tax credits? If so, what documentation is required to support this type of contribution? 4. Minimum and Maximum Amounts Are there minimum or maximum thresholds for donations eligible for tax credits? Clear parameters will help donors plan and align their contributions accordingly. 5. Inclusion of Rentals Can the provision of rented buildings, facilities, or real estate be considered a donation if the rental fees are waived? Such an arrangement could significantly benefit the PNP in terms of operational efficiency. 6. Computer Hardware and Software Can donations of computer hardware and software, including cybersecurity tools and database management systems, be eligible for tax credits? These are critical resources for modern policing and would address the PNP’s need for advanced technological tools. 7. Vehicles Are vehicles included in the list of allowable donations? If so, are there any specifications or restrictions (e.g., type, condition, or purpose) regarding the vehicles eligible for tax credit incentives? By addressing these questions, the government can help foster transparency and incentivize more public and private entities to support the PNP. In turn, this will enhance the PNP’s capability to serve and protect our communities. Thank you for considering this request. I trust in your commitment to making innovative and collaborative solutions possible for the benefit of our nation. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com Cc: Secretary of Interior and Local Government Secretary of Finance Secretary of Information & Communications Technology Commissioner of Internal Revenue Director General, Philippine National Police 01-14-2025

COPRA FOR ANIMAL FEEDS VERSUS COOKING OIL

COPRA FOR ANIMAL FEEDS VERSUS COOKING OIL His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Subject: Comparative Analysis: Copra Meal for Animal Feeds vs. Coconut Cooking Oil and Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) Dear Mr. President, It was recently announced that the Department of Agriculture (DA) is promoting the use of cattle feed that is using copra meal as one of its main ingredients. Apparently, the idea to use copra came about after there was a shortage of soybeans in the world market, a development that has resulted in higher soybean prices. While I believe that that might be a good stop gap measure, it may not be a good strategy in the long run because of many reasons. Producing copra from fresh coconuts has never been a good idea, because by drying the fresh coconut meat, there is already value lost, because precious oil is lost in the drying process. Besides, as the dried copra is stored and transported, it is susceptible to being attacked by insects and vermin. There is also an additional risk about copra being infected by salmonella, which is a danger to both animal health and human health. Recent studies and market experiences have also shown that VCO could even be a better product than coconut cooking oil. The coconut industry offers various opportunities for value addition, but the choice between producing copra meal for animal feeds and producing coconut cooking oil or VCO significantly impacts profitability, value-added potential, and market positioning. Below is a comparative analysis based on profitability, value addition, and other considerations: 1. Producing Copra Meal for Animal Feeds Production Process: Copra meal is a byproduct of extracting coconut oil from dried coconut meat. The process involves drying coconut meat, extracting oil, and milling the remaining residue into copra meal. Market and Profitability: Target Market: Primarily the livestock and aquaculture feed industries. Profitability: Low to moderate. Copra meal is a bulk commodity with relatively low profit margins due to its low unit price. Production Cost: Lower compared to oil production as it involves fewer processing steps. Market Stability: Moderate demand, but it competes with other animal feed options like soybean meal. Value Added: Value Added: Low. Copra meal is a byproduct and often considered a secondary product in the value chain. Price Range: Typically, lower than coconut oil or VCO. Prices fluctuate based on the demand for animal feed and global commodity markets. Sustainability and Byproducts: Minimal waste as copra meal is itself a byproduct. Environmentally sustainable if production adheres to ethical sourcing and energy-efficient drying methods. 2. Producing Coconut Cooking Oil Production Process: Requires copra processing and oil extraction through expelling or solvent extraction. Refining is often needed to produce cooking-grade oil (Refined, Bleached, and Deodorized Coconut Oil, or RBD). Market and Profitability: Target Market: Domestic and international food industries. Profitability: Moderate. Cooking oil has higher unit prices than copra meal, but costs are also higher due to refining. Production Cost: Moderate to high due to equipment, energy, and labor requirements. Market Stability: High demand as a staple cooking ingredient worldwide. Value Added: Value Added: Moderate. The oil is a refined product with a broader market reach and more applications than copra meal. Price Range: Higher than copra meal but lower than VCO. Sustainability and Byproducts: Byproducts like copra meal and coconut husks can be used or sold, reducing waste. 3. Producing VCO Production Process: Extracted from fresh coconut meat through mechanical or natural means (cold pressing, fermentation, or centrifuge). Does not require refining, bleaching, or deodorizing, preserving natural nutrients. Market and Profitability: Target Market: Health-conscious consumers, beauty and cosmetics industries, and niche export markets. Profitability: High. VCO commands premium pricing due to its perceived health benefits and versatility. Production Cost: High. Requires fresh coconuts, specialized equipment, and labor-intensive processing. Market Stability: Growing demand, particularly in health and wellness markets. Value Added: Value Added: Very high. VCO is considered a high-end product, with significant markup potential. Price Range: Substantially higher than both copra meal and cooking oil. Sustainability and Byproducts: Residue from VCO production can be used as a secondary product (e.g., coconut flour or feed). Lower environmental impact if using eco-friendly processing methods. Comparison: Profitability and Value Addition Factor Copra Meal Coconut Cooking Oil Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) Profitability Low to Moderate Moderate High Value Added Low Moderate Very High Market Price Low ($150–$200/ton) Moderate ($1,000/ton) High ($2,000–$3,000/ton) Processing Cost Low Moderate High Market Stability Moderate High High Demand Trends Stable Stable to Growing Rapidly Growing Conclusion 1. Profitability: Producing VCO is the most profitable option due to its high market price and premium consumer demand, especially in export markets. Copra meal is the least profitable, serving as a low-margin commodity. 2. Value Added: VCO also offers the highest value addition, making it ideal for niche markets focused on health, beauty, and wellness. Coconut cooking oil provides moderate value addition, while copra meal is considered a byproduct with limited added value. 3. Recommendation: For long-term profitability and sustainability, focusing on VCO production is advisable. However, if capital and market access are limited, producing coconut cooking oil may serve as a practical intermediate step. Copra meal production should only be pursued as part of an integrated approach to minimize waste and maximize resource utilization. 4. Implementation: Create an inter-agency Technical Working Group (TWG) to study the transition from producing copra meal to producing VCO. However, the TWG could also study how to produce animal feeds from the process of VCO production. TWG members could be DA, DTI and DOST. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com Cc: Hon. Secretary of Agriculture Hon. Secretary of Trade & Industry Hon. Secretary of Science & Technology 01-13-2025

PROTECTING GOD’S CREATION

PROTECTING GOD’S CREATION My Dear Countrymen, I know that there are many environmentalists who are Catholics. While that may be true, I think that it would be safe to say that there are many Catholics who are supporting environmental causes because of their love for the earth, but not necessarily because of their love for God. Because of that, I have often wondered if there is a connection between loving the earth, and loving God. Curious about that, I asked ChatGPT to help me find some answers, and here is what I got: A Catholic Perspective on the Environment The responsibility to protect and nurture God's creation stems from the teachings of the Bible and the rich tradition of Catholic social teaching, including Pope Francis' encyclical Laudato Si’. As stewards of the Earth, we are called to care for the environment, recognizing it as a precious gift from God that sustains life and reflects His glory. Biblical Foundations The Bible provides a clear foundation for environmental stewardship. In the Book of Genesis, God commands humanity to "fill the earth and subdue it" and to "have dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air" (Genesis 1:28). This dominion is not a license for exploitation but a mandate for responsible care and management. In Genesis 2:15, God places Adam in the Garden of Eden "to till it and keep it," highlighting humanity’s role as caretakers of creation. Scripture consistently underscores the interconnectedness of all creation. Psalm 24:1 declares, "The earth is the Lord’s and everything in it," reminding us that the Earth belongs to God, not us. The wisdom literature of the Old Testament, such as the Book of Job, also celebrates the majesty and complexity of creation, inspiring awe and respect for the natural world. Insights from Laudato Si’ Pope Francis’ encyclical Laudato Si’ calls for a renewed commitment to caring for our common home. Rooted in Catholic teaching, the encyclical emphasizes the moral dimensions of the environmental crisis. Pope Francis warns of the "rapidification" of unsustainable human activities, which harm both the environment and the poor, who are most vulnerable to ecological degradation. In Laudato Si’, Pope Francis presents the concept of "integral ecology," which sees the environmental crisis as inseparable from social justice issues. He states, “Everything is connected,” stressing that the destruction of the environment ultimately harms human dignity. The encyclical urges all people, especially Catholics, to embrace lifestyles that reflect simplicity and solidarity with the poor, addressing both ecological and human needs. Catholic Teaching on Environmental Stewardship Catholic social teaching frames environmental care as a moral obligation, rooted in respect for life and the common good. The principle of the common good calls us to ensure that natural resources are preserved not only for present generations but for future ones. The preferential option for the poor, another key Catholic principle, challenges us to address environmental injustices that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. The Church teaches that environmental care is a form of respect for the Creator. As stewards of creation, we honor God by preserving the beauty and integrity of the natural world. Pope Benedict XVI, often referred to as the "Green Pope," emphasized that environmental stewardship is an essential part of living out our faith. A Call to Action Protecting God’s creation demands both personal and collective action. As individuals, we can adopt sustainable practices, reduce waste, and advocate for policies that promote environmental sustainability. As communities of faith, we are called to pray for ecological conversion and work together to safeguard the Earth. In conclusion, protecting the environment is not merely an ecological imperative but a spiritual one. It is a profound act of love for God, neighbor, and future generations. Inspired by Scripture, Laudato Si’, and Catholic teaching, we are called to respond with urgency and hope, caring for our common home as faithful stewards of God’s creation. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com 01-12-2025

Digitalization of Customer Relations Management

His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Subject: Digitalization of Customer Relations Management Dear Mr. President, I am writing to propose the adoption and implementation of Customer Relations Management (CRM) systems across government agencies, including Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCCs) and Local Government Units (LGUs), as part of your initiative to digitalize public service delivery. CRM systems, which have long been utilized by the private sector, can greatly enhance citizen engagement and service efficiency. Key Points for Consideration: 1. CRM in the Private and Public Sectors: o CRM software has proven invaluable in the private sector. Unfortunately, very few government entities are currently leveraging its potential. o By adopting CRM, the government can streamline communication, improve citizen satisfaction, and demonstrate your administration’s commitment to modernizing public service delivery. 2. Cost-Effectiveness and Accessibility: o CRM implementation does not require significant expenditure, especially with the availability of Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) versions. o For those seeking advanced functionalities, high-end paid versions are also available. 3. Reframing "Customer" as "Citizen": o In the public sector, the term “customer” can easily be redefined as “citizen,” encompassing taxpayers and voters. o CRM systems can thus serve as powerful tools to enhance government-citizen interactions. 4. Challenges in Current Communication Practices: o Many government websites list only landline numbers, making it difficult for citizens—most of whom rely on mobile phones—to contact them. o The absence of email addresses and mobile numbers exacerbates this issue, and calling landlines from mobile phones remains prohibitively expensive for many. o Agencies with mobile numbers should also sign up for free messaging platforms like Viber, WhatsApp, and Telegram. 5. Call Centers and Responsiveness: o Many agencies with Facebook Messenger accounts rely on autoreplies and fail to respond to citizen queries in a timely manner. o Ideally, government agencies should establish call centers capable of handling voice calls, emails, and text messages, including those from platforms like Viber, WhatsApp, Telegram, and Messenger. 6. Upgrading Project 8888: o I conceptualized Project 8888 to enable citizens to contact the President at any time, from anywhere, using any available device. However, the system’s implementation has deviated from my original design. o Project 8888 should go beyond citizen complaints to include suggestions, questions, and online transactions. o I am volunteering my expertise to help upgrade Project 8888 and align it with your vision of digitalization. 7. Digital Transformation Roadmap: o If digitalization is to eliminate the need for physical appearances in government transactions, the priority should be building robust backend data systems. o Interoperability requires massive data buildup, and the new systems should incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning for enhanced efficiency and predictive capabilities. In summary, a national rollout of CRM systems, combined with an upgraded Project 8888, will revolutionize government services. Citizens will enjoy seamless access to government services, thereby strengthening public trust and engagement. Thank you for considering this proposal. I would be honored to discuss these recommendations further and provide any assistance necessary to implement these transformative initiatives. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com Cc: Hon. Secretary, Department of Information Technology and Communications Hon. Chairman, Civil Service Commission 01-11-2025

PRISONER EXCHANGE

His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Dear Mr. President, I hope this letter finds you in excellent health and spirits. I am writing to recommend that the Philippine government adopt a national policy on prisoner exchange, with the primary objective of bringing home Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) who are incarcerated abroad. This initiative could greatly enhance the welfare of our fellow Filipinos and strengthen our diplomatic relationships with other nations. Key Points Supporting the Proposal: 1. Case of Mary Jane Veloso: o Considering the recent developments in Mary Jane Veloso’s case, we should consider offering Indonesia the return of one Indonesian prisoner currently in Philippine custody as a gesture of goodwill. This act could pave the way more future exchanges. 2. Continuing Program: o Establishing prisoner exchange as a national policy would enable us to systematically bring home Filipino prisoners from abroad. This program can be institutionalized as an ongoing effort by the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) and/or the Department of Migrant Workers (DMW). 3. International Precedents: o The recent prisoner exchange between Russia and Ukraine, even amidst ongoing conflict, demonstrates the feasibility and value of such programs. This underscores the potential for similar arrangements in peacetime to benefit our citizens. 4. Domestic Resources for Exchange: o There are currently many foreign prisoners under the custody of the Bureau of Immigration (BI), Bureau of Corrections (BuCor), and the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP). These individuals could potentially be exchanged for Filipino prisoners abroad. 5. Building a Database: o As part of the preparatory steps for this program, the Philippines should establish a comprehensive database of Filipinos incarcerated abroad. This database would facilitate negotiations and ensure that we prioritize cases effectively based on humanitarian and legal considerations. 6. Humanitarian and Diplomatic Benefits: o Such a policy would not only provide a lifeline for incarcerated OFWs but also strengthen our diplomatic ties with host countries by fostering mutual respect and collaboration. Recommended Actions: 1. Instruct the DFA and DMW to draft a comprehensive framework for a prisoner exchange program, including protocols for identifying eligible individuals and negotiating terms with other nations. 2. Direct the relevant agencies, such as BI, BuCor, and BJMP, to compile a list of foreign nationals in Philippine custody who could be considered for exchange. 3. Establish an inter-agency task force to oversee the implementation of the program and ensure its alignment with international laws and treaties. This initiative aligns with our commitment to protecting the welfare of Filipinos overseas and reinforcing the government’s dedication to inclusive and humane policies. I trust in your visionary leadership to consider this proposal and make a significant impact on the lives of our countrymen. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I remain at your disposal for any further discussions or clarifications. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com cc: Hon. Secretary of Foreign Affairs Hon. Secretary of Migrant Workers Hon. Chairman of Commission of Filipinos Overseas 01-10-2025

POMPANO AS A PRIORITY FISH

Dear Mr. President, I am writing to respectfully recommend that the Philippine government declare Pompano as a priority fish species for cultivation, local production, and export promotion. This initiative could significantly contribute to our national goals of food security, economic development, and sustainable aquaculture. Rationale for Prioritizing Pompano: 1. International Benchmarking: o Australia has already prioritized Pompano and has provided the necessary support for its further development. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) has recently unveiled advancements in aquaculture related to Pompano, as reported in Cosmos Magazine ("CSIRO unveils new white fish for aquaculture industry"). o I recommend instructing the Philippine Embassy in Canberra to explore CSIRO’s approaches and methods in developing this species for potential adoption in the Philippines. 2. Economic and Nutritional Value: o Locally, Pompano farming has shown potential, as highlighted by SEAFDEC/AQD in their article, "Renewing the push for Pompano farming." o Currently, the price of Pompano is higher than Milkfish, but with better production volumes, its price could decrease, providing an alternative and affordable source of white meat fish. o In the long term, Pompano could become more affordable than pork, offering Filipinos a healthier and cost-effective protein alternative. 3. Government Support and Promotion: o Pompano is not currently being actively promoted by the government. With proper support, more farmers and fisherfolk could be encouraged to cultivate this species, boosting local production. o I recommend engaging AUSAID in collaboration with the Australian Embassy in Manila to explore access to advanced species of Pompano being developed or promoted by Australia. Samples or supplies could also be obtained through these partnerships. 4. Interagency Collaboration: o I propose that the Departments of Foreign Affairs (DFA), Agriculture (DA), Environment and Natural Resources and Science (DENR), Science & Technology (DOST) and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) form a joint task force or coordinating committee to spearhead this initiative. o This effort should align with our national food security strategy, considering Australia’s focus on food security through aquaculture. 5. Potential for Brackish Water Cultivation: o Pompano reportedly thrives in brackish water, presenting an opportunity to revitalize abandoned fishponds and provide livelihood to marginalized fishermen and communities. This could significantly improve rural development and poverty alleviation. Recommendations: To support this initiative, I humbly propose the following actions: Instruct the Philippine Embassy in Canberra to gather detailed information about CSIRO’s advancements in Pompano aquaculture. Direct DFA, DA, BFAR, DENR and DOST to collaborate on this project, focusing on research, development, and technology transfer. Explore partnerships with AUSAID and the Australian Embassy in Manila to access advanced species or samples for local propagation. Promote Pompano as a key species in our national aquaculture programs, providing incentives and technical support to interested farmers and fisherfolk. This initiative represents a strategic opportunity to enhance our food security, improve livelihoods, and position the Philippines as a competitive player in the global aquaculture industry. I am confident that under your leadership, this project can become a model for sustainable development. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am hopeful for your favorable consideration. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com cc: Hon. Secretary of Foreign Affairs Hon. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources Hon. Secretary of Agriculture Hon. Secretary of Science and Technology 01-09-2025

Urgent Need for Reforms in the Inspection and Accreditation of Orphanages and Child Care Facilities

His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Your Excellency, Subject: Urgent Need for Reforms in the Inspection and Accreditation of Orphanages and Child Care Facilities I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to express grave concern about the apparent negligence of the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) in its duties to inspect and ensure the welfare of children in orphanages and similar facilities across the Philippines. Several reports highlight systemic issues that require immediate attention: 1. First Report: A Catholic volunteer serving disadvantaged children has raised significant concerns about the current state of DSWD inspections. According to him: o The Bureau of Standards (BS) of the DSWD does not conduct thorough spot visits to childcare homes, nor do they speak directly with the children. o Accredited institutions undergo regular inspections, but most homes remain unaccredited and fail to meet basic standards. o He recommends forming a full-time, independent monitoring team to visit these facilities, engage children one-on-one in safe environments, and assess their well-being and living conditions. 2. Second Report: o Many childcare homes operate without accreditation and are rarely visited by the Bureau of Standards. o Inspections, when conducted, focus solely on physical infrastructure and administrative records, ignoring the emotional and psychological needs of the children. o The absence of healing programs and failure to conduct individual interviews leave the children’s suffering unnoticed and unaddressed. 3. Third Report: o A Bureau of Standards inspector once instructed the orphanage to create a secure "lockdown" room for emotionally upset children, a suggestion reflective of outdated and inappropriate practices. The Bureau of Standards, a key bureau within the DSWD, is tasked with policy development, regulation, accreditation, monitoring, and capacity building for social welfare and development agencies (SWDAs). While systems like the Child Status Index (CSI) and Orphanage Information Management System (OIMS) exist globally to ensure safe and nurturing environments for children, it appears that the Philippines lacks an effective and systematic approach to achieve these goals. Recommendations: 1. Establish an independent monitoring team composed of qualified social workers, psychologists, and child welfare experts to conduct surprise visits and confidential interviews with children in orphanages. 2. Revise and enforce accreditation processes to ensure that all childcare homes meet high standards of care, including the implementation of healing programs. 3. Utilize best practices and tools, such as the CSI and OIMS, to improve the evaluation and management of childcare facilities. 4. Enhance the capacity and accountability of the Bureau of Standards to address these issues promptly and effectively. Mr. President, the children in these facilities are among the most vulnerable members of our society. It is our moral and legal responsibility to protect them and ensure they are provided with a safe, supportive, and nurturing environment. I respectfully urge your office to direct the DSWD to address these deficiencies and implement the necessary reforms. Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. I trust in your commitment to the welfare of Filipino children and your leadership in making meaningful changes. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com cc: Hon. Secretary of Social Welfare and Development Hon. Secretary of Justice Hon. Secretary of Health Hon. Secretary of the Interior and Local Government 01-08-2025

Opportunity to Explore Biochar Technology for Environmental and Agricultural Benefits

01-07-2025 His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Your Excellency, Subject: Opportunity to Explore Biochar Technology for Environmental and Agricultural Benefits I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to bring to your attention a remarkable innovation in renewable energy and environmental sustainability that could benefit our country. A recent article published on www.thecooldown.com titled “Engineer discovers incredible potential of banana peels as unconventional energy source: ‘Very important for the future’” highlights the work of Steve Djeutchou, a certified engineer in renewable energies based in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Mr. Djeutchou has developed a method to transform organic waste, including banana peels, into an environmentally friendly product known as "biochar." Biochar is an ecological charcoal produced through the pyrolysis of organic materials in a low-oxygen environment. Unlike traditional charcoal, its production does not require deforestation, making it a sustainable alternative. Key characteristics and benefits of biochar include: 1. Soil Amendment: Improves soil health by enhancing structure, water retention, and nutrient availability, leading to better crop yields. 2. Carbon Sequestration: Stores carbon in a stable form for years or even centuries, reducing CO₂ emissions. 3. Pollution Remediation: Binds heavy metals and pollutants, aiding in soil and water remediation. 4. Nutrient Retention: Enhances fertilizer efficiency due to its porous structure and high cation exchange capacity. 5. Environmental Impact: Mitigates climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing soil resilience to droughts and floods. 6. Historical Context: Builds on ancient agricultural practices like the "terra preta" soils of the Amazon. Although biochar is not new to the Philippines, Mr. Djeutchou’s innovative methods and use of banana peels could provide valuable insights. The Philippines produces significant volumes of banana peels from manufacturing products such as banana catsup and banana chips. Leveraging this waste to produce biochar could lower production costs and help reduce forest destruction caused by kaingin. Mr. President, I respectfully suggest that you instruct our Embassy in Yaoundé, Cameroon, to reach out to Engineer Djeutchou to obtain information about his technology and explore its potential application in the Philippines. By copy of this letter, I am also requesting the Secretary of Foreign Affairs and the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources to act on this opportunity. Additionally, I request the Secretary of Science and Technology, in cooperation with the Department of Energy, to study how this technology can be adopted and implemented in the Philippines. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am confident that under your leadership, we can harness this innovative approach to support our environmental and agricultural goals. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com cc: Hon. Secretary of Foreign Affairs Hon. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources Hon. Secretary of Science and Technology Hon. Secretary of Energy

Opportunity to Learn from Successful Mangrove Reforestation Efforts in Mexico

01-06- 2025 His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila Your Excellency, Subject: Opportunity to Learn from Successful Mangrove Reforestation Efforts in Mexico I am writing to bring to your attention an inspiring and potentially beneficial initiative in mangrove reforestation that has been successfully implemented in Mexico. A recent article published on www.news.mongabay.com titled "After trial and error, Mexican fishers find key to reforesting a mangrove haven" highlights the work of Mr. David Borbon and his wife Ana Maria Peralta. They are the founders and leaders of a community effort to restore mangrove forests in a fishing village within Mexico’s El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve, one of the country’s largest protected areas. Despite not being a scientist or an engineer, Mr. Borbon has developed innovative methods of propagating mangrove plants. A study published in Nature Magazine noted that his method of planting mangrove propagules under natural conditions successfully replanted 30,000 new plants in three years. To date, their project has planted more than 1.8 million mangroves with an impressive survival rate of 92-94%, according to Mr. Borbon. While the Philippines is home to experts in mangrove cultivation, including internationally renowned Filipino scientist Dr. Jurgenne Honculada Primavera, I believe there is value in learning from Mr. Borbon’s methods. The successful mangrove forest in Kalibo, Aklan, initiated by the late Congressman Allen Salas Quimpo and the late Secretary Fulgencio Factoran, Jr., demonstrates the importance of such initiatives in our country. Mangrove forests are invaluable ecosystems that offer numerous benefits: 1. Biodiversity Support: They provide habitats for diverse species, serving as nurseries for juvenile fish and supporting marine life. 2. Climate Change Mitigation: Mangroves sequester up to five times more carbon than terrestrial forests, making them vital in combating climate change. 3. Erosion Control: Their root systems stabilize shorelines and prevent erosion. 4. Water Quality Improvement: Mangrove roots filter pollutants and trap sediments, enhancing water quality. 5. Economic Resources: They support local economies through fishing, ecotourism, and other activities. 6. Disaster Risk Reduction: Mangroves act as natural buffers against storms, tsunamis, and flooding. 7. Food Security: They support fisheries and provide a habitat for marine species crucial for food security. Mr. President, I respectfully suggest that you instruct our Embassy in Mexico City to reach out to Mr. Borbon to directly obtain information on his methods and explore how we can adapt them for use in the Philippines. By copy of this letter, I am also requesting the Secretary of Foreign Affairs and the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources to act on this opportunity. Additionally, I request the Secretary of Science and Technology to collaborate with the Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development (PCAARRD) to study and potentially implement Mr. Borbon’s techniques in our mangrove reforestation programs. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am confident that under your leadership, we can strengthen our efforts to protect and restore our invaluable mangrove ecosystems. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282, senseneres.blogspot.com cc: Hon. Secretary of Foreign Affairs Hon. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources Hon. Secretary of Science and Technology

USING IMIDAZOLE TO BREAKDOWN PLASTIC WASTE

His Excellency Ferdinand E. Marcos, Jr. President of the Republic of the Philippines Malacañang Palace Manila 01-05-2025 Your Excellency, Subject: Opportunity to Combat Plastic Pollution Using Imidazole-Based Technology I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to bring to your attention a groundbreaking scientific discovery that could significantly aid our country in addressing the pervasive issue of plastic pollution. Scientists at the University of Alabama, led by Professor Jason Bara, have discovered an innovative method to break down waste plastic using a compound known as Imidazole. According to a report published on www.thecooldown.com, Professor Bara and his research team were experimenting with Imidazole when they observed a remarkable reaction—the complete dissolution of plastic waste. Professor Bara's research assistant was quoted as saying, “the plastic is gone, it is all gone.” The University of Alabama has already applied for a patent for this potentially transformative discovery. For context, Imidazole is a five-membered aromatic heterocyclic organic compound containing two nitrogen atoms in its ring structure. It is known for its solubility, reactivity, and applications in various fields, including pharmaceuticals and organic synthesis. This discovery represents a promising new avenue for addressing the environmental and social challenges posed by plastic waste. Given the Philippines' status as one of the countries most affected by plastic pollution, particularly in our seas, I respectfully suggest that we take immediate action to explore this opportunity. Specifically, I recommend the following: 1. Instructing our Embassy in Washington, D.C. to contact the University of Alabama and establish direct communication with Professor Bara to express our interest in this invention. 2. Exploring the possibility of piloting this technology in the Philippines, given our urgent need for effective solutions to manage plastic waste. 3. Engaging the Secretaries of Foreign Affairs, Environment and Natural Resources, and Science and Technology to collaborate on this initiative. The Department of Science and Technology could investigate the feasibility of utilizing Imidazole-based processes within our local context. By positioning the Philippines as an early adopter of this groundbreaking technology, we could make significant strides in mitigating plastic pollution in our seas, rivers, lakes, and urban areas. Such an initiative would also underscore our commitment to environmental stewardship and innovation on the global stage. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. I am confident that your leadership will enable us to seize this unique opportunity to address a pressing environmental challenge. Respectfully yours, Ramon Ike V. Seneres iseneres@yahoo.com, 09088877282 cc: Hon. Secretary of Foreign Affairs Hon. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources Hon. Secretary of Science and Technology

REVISITING THE LAW ABOUT RECYCLING

REVISITING THE LAW ABOUT RECYCLING My dear countrymen, having noticed that our laws about recycling are largely ignored, I thought about revisiting it. But first, here is what the law says about recycling, according to ChatGPT: START QUOTE: In the Philippines, the management of recyclables, including the use of Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs), is governed by Republic Act No. 9003, also known as the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000. Key Provisions Regarding MRFs and Recyclables 1. Establishment of MRFs: o Local Government Units (LGUs) are mandated to establish MRFs in every barangay or cluster of barangays. o MRFs are responsible for receiving, sorting, processing, and storing recyclable materials, as well as compostable and residual waste. 2. Segregation at Source: o Households, businesses, and institutions must segregate waste at the source into biodegradable, recyclable, non-recyclable, and special waste. o Recyclables must be cleaned and prepared for delivery to MRFs or authorized recyclers. 3. Responsibilities of Citizens: o Individuals are encouraged to bring segregated recyclable materials to the nearest MRF. o Participation in recycling programs and proper segregation is a civic duty to support the facility's operations. 4. Prohibited Acts: o Mixing of segregated waste. o Failure to segregate recyclables before collection or delivery to MRFs. 5. Incentives and Support: o LGUs and private entities may provide incentives to encourage citizens to bring recyclables to MRFs, such as waste-for-cash programs or discounts on utilities. 6. Education and Awareness: o LGUs must conduct information campaigns to educate communities about the importance of recycling and the role of MRFs. END QUOTE According to the law, it is very clear that households, businesses, and institutions must segregate waste at the source. However, the way the law was worded, it seems more like a suggestion rather than a command. While the law is clear that recyclables must be cleaned and prepared for delivery to the MRF, it only says that individuals are only “encouraged” to bring segregated recyclable materials to the nearest MRF, thus making it sound as if it is optional. As it is happening now, it seems that very few LGUs are imposing the rule of segregating at source, and the rule of not mixing the segregated waste. In fairness to some households, they are not only following the rule of segregating at source, but they are also following the rule of not mixing the segregated waste. However, when the garbagemen come, they just dump everything into the truck, defeating the purpose of segregation in the first place. Not only that, sometimes the garbagemen remove the contents of the segregated bag, and they just mix all the contents into the truck. As it is supposed to be, the garbagemen are supposed to bring the segregated wastes into the MRF, where these are supposed to be further sorted for eventual sale to recyclers or junk shops. It seems however that the popular practice now is to bring all the contents of the garbage truck to the dumpsites, and not even to the landfills. Who is supposed to be monitoring and implementing the provisions of the law? Is it the DENR or the DILG? Would it not be better if these two agencies are coordinating? Your friend, IKE SENERES/01-04-25/visit my blog senseneres.blogspot.com

LEARNING FROM THE DUTCH MILK COOP MODEL

LEARNING FROM THE DUTCH MILK COOP MODEL My dear countrymen, in my opinion, the business of an agricultural cooperative has four main components, namely production, processing, packaging and marketing. Usually, the production component is done by the individual members on their own, sometimes with the help of their family members. However, the other three components, namely processing, packaging and marketing are usually done collectively by the cooperative itself. That is basically the Dutch milk cooperative model that is so successful, it has been adopted all over the world. Here are the key features of the Dutch coop model, according to ChatGPT: 1. Farmer-Owned Cooperatives: o Farmers are both suppliers and shareholders of the cooperative. o Members share profits based on their milk contributions and cooperative performance. 2. Centralized Milk Collection and Processing: o Cooperatives establish centralized facilities to collect raw milk from member farms. o The milk is processed into various dairy products such as cheese, butter, yogurt, and milk powder. 3. High-Quality Standards: o Strict quality controls are implemented at every stage, from production to processing. o Farmers receive training and support to maintain consistent quality. 4. Market-Oriented Operations: o Cooperatives focus on market trends, consumer demands, and global trade opportunities. o Products are branded and marketed internationally to maximize reach and profitability. 5. Sustainable Practices: o Emphasis on environmentally friendly and sustainable farming methods. o Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and manage waste efficiently. 6. Vertical Integration: o Cooperatives control the entire supply chain, from milk production to product distribution. o This ensures cost efficiency and quality consistency. I noticed in their definition that the members are both suppliers and shareholders and in one instance, they are also called “contributors”. Although ChatGPT is not very specific about it, it seems implied that once the raw milk harvests are delivered to the processing plant, these are considered “sold” and the “sales” goes to the account of the member. What that means is that the member does have to worry about selling his milk harvests anymore, because his market is guaranteed. On the other hand, the cooperative, being the buyer, does not have to worry about their raw materials anymore, because it is also guaranteed. Obviously, the dairy farmers who only own a few dairy cows do not have the economies of scale to put up their own processing and packaging plants. They also could not afford to invest in the logistics needed to market their finished products, especially those needing refrigeration and cold storage. That is where the cooperative approach becomes practical. Also, according to Chat GPT, one of the world's largest dairy cooperatives, Friesland Campina, follows the Dutch model. It represents thousands of dairy farmers and exports products globally. The cooperative reinvests in innovation and farmer development, ensuring long-term growth. Based on my own research, there is sufficient legal basis for both NGAs and LGUs to support all cooperatives in general and all dairy cooperatives in particular, with inputs for production, processing, packaging and marketing. These could be in the form of financing or equipment. And although some cooperatives might prefer to go into dairy cows, they could also add dairy goats and dairy carabaos. Your friend, IKE SENERES/01-03-25/visit my blog senseneres.blogspot.com

SETTING TARGETS FOR LOCAL MILK PRODUCTION

SETTING TARGETS FOR LOCAL MILK PRODUCTION My dear countrymen, according to ChatGPT, “the Philippines' demand for dairy products is substantial and growing. In 2025, consumption is projected to reach 3 million metric tons (MMT) in liquid milk equivalent (LME), a 2% increase from 2024. Domestic milk production remains limited, meeting only about 1% of the country's total dairy requirements. In the first half of 2024, local production was approximately 16,020 metric tons, accounting for just 21% of the total liquid milk supply during that period. Consequently, the Philippines relies heavily on imports to satisfy its dairy needs, sourcing 99% of its supply from international markets. This growing demand is driven by factors such as an expanding middle class, population growth, and increasing consumer spending on dairy products. Despite efforts to boost local production, the significant gap between domestic output and consumption necessitates continued reliance on imports to meet the country's dairy needs”. Also, according to ChatGPT, “comparative advantage and competitive advantage are economic and business concepts that describe different aspects of an entity's ability to succeed in a market”. Here are the differences according to the AI: Comparative advantage is a concept from economics that occurs when a country, business, or individual can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. It focuses on efficiency and resource allocation. And it emphasizes specializing in goods where a country or entity is relatively more efficient. For example, country A produces wine more efficiently than textiles. Country B produces textiles more efficiently than wine. Even if Country A is better at producing both, it benefits by specializing in wine and trading with Country B for textiles. On the other hand, competitive advantage is a concept from business strategy that refers to an entity's ability to outperform competitors by creating superior value for its customers, either through cost leadership, differentiation, or focus. It emphasizes unique attributes or capabilities that give an edge over rivals. For example, a company that offers innovative features in its product (e.g., Apple's focus on design and ecosystem integration) has a differentiation advantage, or a company with highly efficient operations that allows it to sell at a lower price (e.g., Walmart) has a cost advantage. Obviously, we neither have the comparative advantage nor the competitive advantage when it comes to exporting milk. That is so because we are not producing enough milk, and as a matter of fact, we are importing about 99% of our domestic milk requirements. However, we do have both advantages when it comes to bananas, hence it makes perfect sense to trade our bananas with milk from New Zealand. The question is, should we keep on producing milk if we could just keep on trading our bananas with milk? My answer is yes, and as a matter of fact, we should make it our national goal to produce 100% of our domestic milk requirement. Beyond that, we should also make it our national goal to become a net exporter of milk. The reasons for that are obvious. Milk production not only creates livelihood, but it also ensures our food security. Not only that, it can also solve our problem of child wasting, child stunting and child malnutrition. Your friend, IKE SENERES/01-02-25/visit my blog senseneres.blogspot.com